Thanks.
I ask one more moment of assistance to ensure proper structure. Do the 3
groupings below make sense to you? Elements of the "FameHLI::HLI" module
will be regularly used by anyone using the functions in either of the other
two sets. Or would it be more appropriate to have "HLI" and "EXT
tionally, it does not include new functionality available in the
newer releases of Fame and _cannot_ incorporate that functionality easily
with any sort of backward compatibility.
--daveo
-Original Message-
From: Tim Bunce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:19 AM
To:
I am QUITE amenable to "FameHLI::API" since, as you point out, more modules
are likely to be added, albeit by the small incestuous community of FAME
programmers (including me).
The "Fame::*" namespace is already in use with "Fame::HLI", "Fame::LANG" and
"Fame::" by TRIAS.
The actual Fame product
