Re: Resource file module (was: author ID request)

2001-08-28 Thread Andrew M. Langmead
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 12:49:52PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > I think the Mac:: category could be read as 'Macish'. > > Same goes for all the platform specific categories. Spawning Macish::, > Win32ish::, VMSish::, Solarisish:: categories would not be good! > > Certainly if I wanted to read a Ma

Resource file module (was: author ID request)

2001-08-27 Thread Andrew M. Langmead
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:59:46AM -0400, Kirrily Robert wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 12:21:06AM -0400, Andrew M. Langmead wrote: > | I guess to bring it to a point, I strongly feel that Mac:: is the > | wrong hierarchy for the module to be in. The choice of Data:: wasn't > |

Re: author ID request

2001-08-26 Thread Andrew M. Langmead
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 07:27:24PM -0400, Kirrily Robert wrote: > >The first thing I want to contribute is a cleaned up version of > >Data::MacResFile, a module for non-Macintosh systems to read > >compontents out of a Macintosh resource file. > > Data:: is so generic it's almost meaningless... a

author ID request

2001-08-25 Thread Andrew M. Langmead
% your name: Andrew Langmead % your email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: % your homepage if you have one: % your preferred user-ID on CPAN: LANGMEAD % a short description of what you're planning to contribute: The first thing I want to contribute is a cleaned up version of Data::MacResFile, a