From a quick glance at the first error, it involves using
is_deeply to compare arrays of arrays, not hashes. So
it's not clear "how Perl organizes the hash" gets involved.
You also have a failure on perl 5.8.1 that looks very similar,
so 5.6.2 is less of a suspect.
You need to explain certain a
Bruce Gray's reply indicates that your routine, that constructs the
array that you were comparing to the "gold" one, was populating the
array by using each(%hash). Since the order in which entries are
returned is not consistent, you can't use a "known correct"
comparison.
It seems he even sent y
$^X is simpler, and simpler solutions are preferable.
Can it be wrong?
cmac
On Feb 17, 2010, at 4:02 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 06:47:25PM -0800, cr...@animalhead.com wrote:
So I would like to add some tests to one of my test files,
involving something like `perl -c s
I don't use Module::Install either, but here's a snippet that
does dynamic requiring using EU::MM directly:
# require JE if no JavaScript
eval 'require JavaScript';
my @optional = $@ ? ('JE' => 0.044) : ();
WriteMakefile(
'PREREQ_PM' => {'LWP' => 5.834,
ad 14K per week. The current week is down to 2600.
That's one good piece of news in the world.
Craig MacKenna
http://www.animalhead.com
On Sep 6, 2011, at 2:52 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On 2011-09-06 10:15 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
But it does seem that the *only* firm that is
