Namespace discussion - VMware::LM

2010-02-04 Thread Aditya Ivaturi
I already submitted a request to register the namespace VMware::LM for a new module I am writing. This module is an interface to the VMware Lab Manager SOAP API - http://www.vmware.com/pdf/lm40_soap_api_guide.pdf. But when I think about it more, WWW::VMware::LM seems to more appropriate namespace

Re: Namespace discussion - VMware::LM

2010-02-04 Thread Aditya Ivaturi
> Since its a special case of SOAP the SOAP should go before VMWare IMHO. > Also it sounds like a network protocol thing rather than a www thing. www > implies html not just http. SOAP uses XML. > Sounds reasonable. So since I already submitted a request for VMware::LM, will it just be ignored? O

Re: Namespace discussion - VMware::LM

2010-02-05 Thread Aditya Ivaturi
> > New root namespaces are not necessarily a bad thing.  Individual modules > with top-level names are discouraged, but e.g. VMware::LabManager would > be just fine. > Ah, I misunderstood that guideline for creating root Namespace. Thanks for clarifying it. --aditya

Re: Why are you releasing modules to CPAN?

2010-05-27 Thread Aditya Ivaturi
> > Is it for the fun of writing code? - You don't need to distribute your > code for that. > Is it to participate in the community? > Is it to get a virtual pat on the shoulder (or a beer in the bar) from > other programmers? > Is it to make other people happy by letting them do their job easier?