"throw away" module namespace

2014-12-12 Thread Chris Marshall
All- I'm working on some new module development and I would like to make the progress available via CPAN and for testing, I don't want to start claiming package namespaces until things settle down. I thought I read somewhere that there is a way to have a "non-comittal" CPAN module in the sense th

Re: "throw away" module namespace

2014-12-12 Thread Yanick Champoux
On 14-12-12 11:33 AM, Chris Marshall wrote: > Else, any recommendations on how to > accomplish the goal of not locking in the > namespaces until the organization of the > various components settle down? Just throwing ideas: an alternative would be to have your module lives on GitHub, and use the f

Re: "throw away" module namespace

2014-12-12 Thread James E Keenan
On 12/12/2014 11:38 AM, Yanick Champoux wrote: On 14-12-12 11:33 AM, Chris Marshall wrote: Else, any recommendations on how to accomplish the goal of not locking in the namespaces until the organization of the various components settle down? Just throwing ideas: an alternative would be to have

Re: "throw away" module namespace

2014-12-12 Thread Neil Bowers
Hi Chris, > I'm working on some new module development and I would like to make the > progress available via CPAN and for testing, I don't want to start claiming > package namespaces until things settle down. > > I thought I read somewhere that there is a way to have a "non-comittal" CPAN > mo

Re: "throw away" module namespace

2014-12-12 Thread Christian Walde
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:33:58 +0100, Chris Marshall wrote: All- I'm working on some new module development and I would like to make the progress available via CPAN and for testing, I don't want to start claiming package namespaces until things settle down. I thought I read somewhere that the