On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:38:55PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Lutz Gehlen wrote:
> > Hi Gabor,
> >
> > On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 09:04:31 Gabor Szabo wrote:
> >> I just wanted to update a distribution and ensure that all the
> >> modules in a distribution have
>
We found it very difficult to tweak parts of that framework so we
rewrote it (or rather most of it) with the 'single responsibility'
principle in mind. We also ported it to Moose and made immutable
objects where ever we could.
The result is three distributions. Now on github and soon on CPAN:
h
On Wed, January 9, 2013 9:03 pm, David Christensen wrote:
>
> There seems to be two competing points of view regarding version
> numbering for software source code files:
>
> 1. Per-file -- a unique version number for each file that increments
> when that file changes. RCS and CVS use this approa
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:06:10AM -0600, John M. Gamble wrote:
> Yeah, after dithering about it for a few days, I went with the philosophy
> that the package has the version, not the individual modules. For the
> simple reason that the package as a whole is what's being developed, from
> the docum
