Re: XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-06-01 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Philippe Bruhat (BooK) [2012-06-01 01:25]: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:12:37PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:49:36AM -0700, Jarrod Overson wrote: > > > You lose the version's value as an actual number, but you gain > > > more standard readability as to what the ver

Re: XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-06-01 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi all, On Thu, 31 May 2012 11:31:21 +0300 Shlomi Fish wrote: > Hi all, > > earlier today I uploaded XML-LibXML-1.99 and since the 1.* releases had two > trailing digits, the next version will be past 2. This is a good to switch to > a > better versioning scheme, with more digits after the fir