Solaris Perl is compiled using the Sun C compiler since at least Solaris 8.
Once known as Forte now Solaris Studio.
IDK what Perl on Moc OS X is compiled with but suspect not gcc. A LOT of people
write Perl on Mac.
Not everyone runs Linux. It is completely legitimate to have CPAN modules which
Linux isn't the only widely supported unix. FrreBSD , NetBSD have their
adherents. Solaris is pretty widely used just not among consumers / desktops.
Then you have Mac OS X which isn't exactly unix but is unix-like in many
aspects (has a bash shell, you can use vi or emacs and of course perl).
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 10:21:32PM -0800, Linda W wrote:
> Dana Hudes wrote:
> >BTW not everyone uses gcc.
> What compiler on linux -- where perl was born, would you suggest?
Other compilers are available for Linux. I leave finding them as an
exercise for you. You will no doubt find it to be a h
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:27:08PM +, Dana Hudes wrote:
> Finally, Perl runs on Windows. There are a number of Windows-specific Perl
> modules.
And don't forget that there are at least three different Windows
environments these days!
Win32, Cygwin, and "Interix" (what used to be Services Fo
David Cantrell joked:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 10:21:32PM -0800, Linda W wrote:
Dana Hudes wrote:
BTW not everyone uses gcc.
[[ What compiler on unix-- where perl was born, that is as freely available
as perl and the modules on cpan, itself would you suggest I use? ]]
O
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:42:30AM -0800, Linda W wrote:
> David Cantrell joked:
> >On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 10:21:32PM -0800, Linda W wrote:
> >>[[ What compiler on unix-- where perl was born
" liar liar pants on fire "
That's not what you wrote. Nor is it what I quoted.
> Or would you like to
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:42:30AM -0800, Linda W wrote:
>
> The assertion was that such a thing does not. It is is incumbent
> upon you, who want to refute that
> assertion to provide at least 1 example to disprove the general
> assertion. Claiming it is a research
> opportunity (becaus
What, no mention of LLVM/Clang? :-(
I have been meaning to try that myself.
I have also had great success using TCC (Tiny C Compiler) in the past,
which does x86 compilation.
Cheers,
Jonathan
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:42:30AM -0800, Li
On Dec 5, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:42:30AM -0800, Linda W wrote:
>
>>
>>The assertion was that such a thing does not. It is is incumbent
>> upon you, who want to refute that
>> assertion to provide at least 1 example to disprove the general
>> a
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:42:30AM -0800, Linda W wrote:
The assertion was that such a thing does not. It is is incumbent
upon you, who want to refute that
assertion to provide at least 1 example to disprove the general
assertion. Claiming it is a research
o
David Cantrell wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:42:30AM -0800, Linda W wrote:
David Cantrell joked:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 10:21:32PM -0800, Linda W wrote:
[[ What compiler on unix-- where perl was born
" liar liar pants on fire "
That's not what you wrote. No
To download stuff from Oracle you have to register with them (free) and
agree to their license terms.
Download Solaris Studio from
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solarisstudio/downloads/index-jsp-141149.html
This is not just C/C++ it is also a Java compiler and Netbeans and IIRC
Started this, this morning before any of 'today's emails...just never
finished it..
Seems pertinent with the talk of alternate packages that only work with
alternate
compilers -- especially those that are limited in the platforms they
support (Gnu is on
Linux, Windows, Mac, Solaris, Irix, et
13 matches
Mail list logo
