On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 04:57:55PM +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Arthur Corliss [2011-08-28 21:40]:
> > My humor was perhaps too subtle, since you didn't get the
> > relevance of my reply. Google switching to SSL by default is as
> > pointless as metacpan. In the former case it's the "prot
* Peter Pentchev [2011-09-11 02:50]:
> I also wonder why is it that nobody has so far brought up
> another important consequence of using SSL, at least with
> a trusted certificate at the other end - protection from not
> just eavesdropping, but also man-in-the-middle attacks. Yes, it
> seems kind
