Hi I found a module on CPAN http://search.cpan.org/~goyali/google_talk_bot_v_01/
with the following comment regarding licensing:
"You are not allowed to modify the script unless having the written
permission of abhishek jain"
I am just wondering if having such code on CPAN is really what we want.
Howdy,
Quite interesting.
Personally, I would not touch said code, and I would argue that any code on CPAN
that is not under an OSI-approved license be removed.
People that stand on the shoulders of giants, yet don't allow others to stand
on theirs should not benefit from the glory of CPAN.
Duk
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> Hi I found a module on CPAN
> http://search.cpan.org/~goyali/google_talk_bot_v_01/
> with the following comment regarding licensing:
>
> "You are not allowed to modify the script unless having the written
> permission of abhishek jain"
>
> Wh
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:53 AM, David Nicol wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>
>> Hi I found a module on CPAN
>> http://search.cpan.org/~goyali/google_talk_bot_v_01/
>> with the following comment regarding licensing:
>>
>> "You are not allowed to modify the sc
Le lundi 14 mars 2011 16:22:22, Gabor Szabo a écrit :
> To be on the safe side I decided to not even try the code so I won't need
> to look at it which might break the license.
>
> What do you think?
Well, if you look at the source code, you see that abhishek did reuse code
from Nicholas Perez [
On 11-03-14 04:42 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Le lundi 14 mars 2011 16:22:22, Gabor Szabo a écrit :
To be on the safe side I decided to not even try the code so I won't need
to look at it which might break the license.
What do you think?
Well, if you look at the source code, you see that abhi
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Bill Ward wrote:
> I think that copyright still applies for copying the original. You don't
> have to make a derived work of an MP3 file for it to be an illegal copy for
> example. But it does seem like posting it on CPAN would give de facto
> permission to cop