When developing code to include
One might think it intolerably rude
To use words ungrammatical
As a method pragmatical
To avoid compilation being screwed
:-P
On 8 October 2010 00:13, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:36:41PM +0100, Charles Colbourn wrote:
>
>> Test::Include::DontR
Hi all,
It occurs to me that the uses for this could extend outside testing.
Looking at CPAN, the root namespace 'Include' already exists, so
Include::DontRun would be a viable name, and seems pretty descriptive
to me.
Anyone got any objections?
I've handled the __DATA__ and __END__ cases now.
