It's already a common convention for module authors to have an 'eg'
directory which contains examples.
How about making this into a top level namespace (Generally top level
namespaces are discouraged, but in this case it might be beneficial and
encourage other authors to place more robust and
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> * bulk 88 [2012-06-08 03:20]:
>> It only real purpose is to be copied into other XS modules and be
>> studied from. What namespace should it go under?
>
> CopyPasta::FastHash? :-)
>
> In all seriousness, I would pick Example::XS::Faster
* bulk 88 [2012-06-08 03:20]:
> It only real purpose is to be copied into other XS modules and be
> studied from. What namespace should it go under?
CopyPasta::FastHash? :-)
In all seriousness, I would pick Example::XS::FasterHashes. Or maybe
just Example::FasterXSHashes.
XS:: seems the wrong p
I have a XS module I wrote as a sample, example or tutorial on how to do
increase the performance of perl hashes on an XS level. It doesn't do anything
useful on its own other provide 2 XSUBs which are supposed to be benchmarked
against each other to show the traditional vs my "new" way of doin
