Re: CPAN Meta Spec Version 2 released

2010-04-20 Thread David Nicol
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:51 AM, David Golden wrote: > Dotted-decimals have a "round-trip" problem when being compared to > decimals.  Depending on the order that things are converted, you can > get different answers. > > Consider "v1.2.1000.3".  How should that be converted to a decimal > versio

Re: CPAN Meta Spec Version 2 released

2010-04-20 Thread Elliot Shank
On 4/19/10 7:51 AM, David Golden wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Elliot Shank wrote: Oof. Version numbers: "All components after the first are restricted to the range 0 to 999." That's going to be a problem for those of us who include things like VCS revisions and CI build numbers in v

Re: CPAN Meta Spec Version 2 released

2010-04-19 Thread David Golden
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Elliot Shank wrote: > Oof.  Version numbers: "All components after the first are restricted to the > range 0 to 999."  That's going to be a problem for those of us who include > things like VCS revisions and CI build numbers in version numbers. You can do that as

Re: CPAN Meta Spec Version 2 released

2010-04-19 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 06:55:49AM -0500, Elliot Shank wrote: > Oof. Version numbers: "All components after the first are restricted to > the range 0 to 999." That's going to be a problem for those of us who > include things like VCS revisions and CI build numbers in version numbers. The way I

Re: CPAN Meta Spec Version 2 released

2010-04-19 Thread Elliot Shank
Oof. Version numbers: "All components after the first are restricted to the range 0 to 999." That's going to be a problem for those of us who include things like VCS revisions and CI build numbers in version numbers.