My first thought was to question whether INC needed to be a whole level
in the
name, but... upon consideration, yes, because it's the main point of the
module.
Plus, there's precedence in Devel-INC-Sorted.
So my next thought is the third-level name. I'd drop the "My" and the
"First"
and just c
* David Cantrell [2015-10-06 17:35]:
> One of my modules is Sub::WrapPackages. It has a feature where you can
> invoke it once and it will both wrap itself around code that's already
> been loaded, but will also lurk in the background and do Things to
> code that is loaded in the future. It does t
One of my modules is Sub::WrapPackages. It has a feature where you can
invoke it once and it will both wrap itself around code that's already
been loaded, but will also lurk in the background and do Things to code
that is loaded in the future. It does this by dropping sub-refs in @INC.
It also
