On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Matthew Musgrove wrote:
> Joel,
> This is exactly what I looking for. I should have read the PostgreSQL
> specific docs for DBIx::ProcedureCall because I have only used it from
> Oracle. From what you have written here, I will want to use
> DBIx::Pg::CallFunction
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> 1. Regarding the choice of licence, see:
>
I have changed the license to MIT, which was my original idea but then I
saw some other
modules having the combo of Artistic+GPL.
I agree with your arguments, better to stick to MIT.
> 2. %WriteMak
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:20 PM, John M. Gamble wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 7:46 am, Matthew Musgrove wrote:
>> Joel,
>> Perhaps you could explain how DBIx::Pg::CallFunction differs from
>> DBIx::ProcedureCall and why someone would choose one over the other?
>>
>> http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBI
ssing millions of
transactions,
so I urge you to try to help me find any eventual bugs before putting it in
production.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Joel Jacobson (CPAN: JOELJAC)
