Re: DBIx::Pg::CallFunction

2012-05-31 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Shmuel, On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:07:40 +0900 Shmuel Fomberg wrote: > Hi Shlomi. > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > > > > 4. In the same file, "use strict;" should be separated from the shabang > > with an > > empty line. > > > > This one I didn't get. Why is that? >

Re: DBIx::Pg::CallFunction

2012-05-31 Thread Shmuel Fomberg
Hi Shlomi. On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > 4. In the same file, "use strict;" should be separated from the shabang > with an > empty line. > This one I didn't get. Why is that? Shmuel.

Re: XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-05-31 Thread Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:12:37PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:49:36AM -0700, Jarrod Overson wrote: > > From a non-perl-centric viewpoint, the vast majority of projects I work > > with nowadays abide by the semantic versioning concept (your v4) : > > > > http://semver

Re: XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-05-31 Thread David Cantrell
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:49:36AM -0700, Jarrod Overson wrote: > From a non-perl-centric viewpoint, the vast majority of projects I work > with nowadays abide by the semantic versioning concept (your v4) : > > http://semver.org/ > > You lose the version's value as an actual number, but you gain

Re: XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-05-31 Thread Jarrod Overson
>From a non-perl-centric viewpoint, the vast majority of projects I work with nowadays abide by the semantic versioning concept (your v4) : http://semver.org/ You lose the version's value as an actual number, but you gain more standard readability as to what the version means, which is something

Re: XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-05-31 Thread Serguei Trouchelle
Shlomi Fish wrote: earlier today I uploaded XML-LibXML-1.99 and since the 1.* releases had two trailing digits, the next version will be past 2. This is a good to switch to a better versioning scheme, with more digits after the first dot, which will give us more air to breath. I'm asking you wh

Re: XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-05-31 Thread Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯
> wouldn't getting it right in Build.PL or dist.ini (or > whatever tool you use) be equally important? I never had to think about that. See my distros in the wild, they don't mention the distro version number there. * EUMM * M::B

Re: XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-05-31 Thread John M. Gamble
I'm curious -- I know PAUSE checks the $VERSION in the package (I ran into a "thought that was inherited" problem once), but isn't it using the the version key in the META.json or META.yml files for its indexing? So while getting the version information right in $VERSION is important, wouldn't gett

Re: XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-05-31 Thread Fields, Christopher J
Pretty much came about this independently for bioperl, but maybe it's a bit like convergent evolution :) bioperl uses the 1.x.y versioning and it has been a real pain to deal will over the years. We've discussed this over the years, and since we're breaking bioperl up into smaller releases we

Re: XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-05-31 Thread Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯
This will be part of my talk at YAPC. I recommend you use 2.xxx, where xxx is always zero-padded. our $VERSION = '2.001'; # 2nd version of revision 2 our $VERSION = '2.420'; # 421st version of revision 2 It has the following properties: * It is fully compatible with the advice in *

Re: XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-05-31 Thread Aldo Calpini
On 05/31/2012 10:31 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote: 4. "2.x.y" - I use this for my open source C projects and some of my CPAN modules and perl 5 and Parrot use it as well. Is it well supported with the CPAN toolchain? Also note that, at least concerning Perl, it looks like 4, but is really 2 :-) That

Re: XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-05-31 Thread David Cantrell
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:31:21AM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > earlier today I uploaded XML-LibXML-1.99 and since the 1.* releases had two > trailing digits, the next version will be past 2. This is a good to switch to > a > better versioning scheme, with more digits after the first dot, which wi

XML-LibXML's 2.* Versioning Scheme: Please Advise.

2012-05-31 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi all, earlier today I uploaded XML-LibXML-1.99 and since the 1.* releases had two trailing digits, the next version will be past 2. This is a good to switch to a better versioning scheme, with more digits after the first dot, which will give us more air to breath. I'm asking you what the advant