Re: Module::Build and ActiveState

2010-01-09 Thread Klaus
On 7 jan, 16:12, klau...@gmail.com (Klaus) wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Klaus wrote: > > > I have a patch that fixes those problems. 3 modules are to be patched: > > > "ActivePerl::DocTools::Pod", "ExtUtils::Command::MM" and > > > "Module::Build::Base". > > On 7 jan, 13:59, jona...@

Re: satiating cpantesters

2010-01-09 Thread David Cantrell
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 11:48:19AM -0800, Eric Wilhelm wrote: > # from David Cantrell > # on Saturday 09 January 2010 07:44: > >Fine, but if you *don't* claim to have succeeded, then you have to > >expect that software that looks for failures will spot the failure and > >report it. > As the author'

Re: satiating cpantesters

2010-01-09 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from David Cantrell # on Saturday 09 January 2010 07:44: >Fine, but if you *don't* claim to have succeeded, then you have to >expect that software that looks for failures will spot the failure and >report it. As the author's fault? Right. --Eric -- perl -e 'srand; print join(" ",sort({rand()

Re: satiating cpantesters

2010-01-09 Thread David Cantrell
Eric Wilhelm wrote: > # from David Cantrell > # on Wednesday 06 January 2010 03:48: >> Exiting with a 0 status would seem to be the least clunky solution. >> exit(0) means "Stop now and claim to have succeeded" > But you didn't succeed because something's wrong and thus on the way out > you must m