On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:34:32AM +0100, Christian Bartolomaeus wrote:
> * On 2008-02-04 David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Daniel T. Staal wrote:
> > >My first thought, after looking through your Wikipedia link, is to ask if
> > >there is anything specifcally 'chess' about your module
* On 2008-02-05 Philippe Bruhat (BooK) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:34:32AM +0100, Christian Bartolomaeus wrote:
> >
> > But apart from that, you are right: It should be easy to add
> > algorithms for other (non chess) rating systems to my module -- and I
> > would be in
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:34:32AM +0100, Christian Bartolomaeus wrote:
>
> But apart from that, you are right: It should be easy to add
> algorithms for other (non chess) rating systems to my module -- and I
> would be interested in doing that.
>
> Therefore it would be good to find a more gener
Hi Rafael! (and everybody)
On Feb 5, 2008 2:14 AM, Rafael Martinez Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > No need for apology. You are a volunteer just as the rest of us.
> >
> > Now it will be harvested by the spam-bots and you will get tons of spam to
> > this address too :-)
> >
> Me naive !
* On 2008-02-04 Daniel T. Staal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [...]
> My first thought, after looking through your Wikipedia link, is to
> ask if there is anything specifcally 'chess' about your module: That
> ratings system looks to be useable (and used...) outside the one
> area.
Yes, that's tr
* On 2008-02-04 Jonathan Rockway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [...]
> > I think about putting some generic, non-specific methods in a separate
> > module, which wouldn't be useful by itself, but would be used by the
> > more specific modules. Maybe it would be useful to put those generic
> > method
