* Philippe "BooK" Bruhat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-12 20:55]:
> Le lundi 12 juin 2006 à 20:09, A. Pagaltzis écrivait:
> >
> >> An improvement would be to turn it into a forum, maybe merge
> >> with CPAN forums but keeping reviews separate from technical
> >> support questions. (Bad reviews such
Le lundi 12 juin 2006 à 20:09, A. Pagaltzis écrivait:
>
> > An improvement would be to turn it into a forum, maybe merge
> > with CPAN forums but keeping reviews separate from technical
> > support questions. (Bad reviews such as "how do I compile
> > module X" can be moved into technical support
* Robert Rothenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-12 12:35]:
> I quite like CPAN Ratings, and find that most of the ratings
> are useful. That there is some junk in there is no reason to
> kill it off.
The subject was hyperbole – obviously, I hope. But I felt the
need to voice objection stronger th
Orton, Yves wrote:
Try a posting on perlmonks. He used to frequent that site ona regular
basis.
unfortunately, this is not the case anymore :-)
but fortunately, BooK just warned me about this thread, so I quickly
joined the mailing list. let me say that I feel very, very sorry about
the c
I quite like CPAN Ratings, and find that most of the ratings are useful.
That there is some junk in there is no reason to kill it off.
An improvement would be to turn it into a forum, maybe merge with CPAN
forums but keeping reviews separate from technical support questions. (Bad
reviews such as
Title: RE: What to do about abandoned / unmaintained CPAN code?
> -Original Message-
> From: Linda W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 12:34 AM
> To: module-authors@perl.org
> Subject: What to do about abandoned / unmaintained CPAN code?
>
>
>
> I was going t
