Re: plugin manager module - namespace suggestions please

2005-03-10 Thread Ofer Nave
Baltasar Cevc wrote: A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Baltasar Cevc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-10 13:25]: >> use Modularizer; > Well, I can't think of anything really helpful right now, but I > have to register that that name is pretty horrible. It should > definitely be in Module:: and ment

Re: plugin manager module - namespace suggestions please

2005-03-10 Thread Baltasar Cevc
A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Baltasar Cevc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-10 13:25]: >> use Modularizer; > Well, I can't think of anything really helpful right now, but I > have to register that that name is pretty horrible. It should > definitely be in Module:: and mention Plugin somehow. M

Re: plugin manager module - namespace suggestions please

2005-03-10 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Baltasar Cevc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-10 13:25]: >use Modularizer; Well, I can't think of anything really helpful right now, but I have to register that that name is pretty horrible. It should definitely be in Module:: and mention Plugin somehow. Maybe something like Module:

Re: what namespace for future new module ?

2005-03-10 Thread Cédric Bouvier
Le jeudi 10 mars 2005, à 12 heures 16, David Landgren écrivait : > Distributed, yes, but Distributed::Simple, no. In general I dislike > modules named *::Simple. Because they never are. And doubly more so if > it's not actually simplifying what another module, e.g. > Distributed::Complicated::Ho

plugin manager module - namespace suggestions please

2005-03-10 Thread Baltasar Cevc
Hi there, I wrote a little plugin manager module which should be usable for more or less any kind of application. The goal was to do provide a standarized interface to create an application (script/daemon/etc.) with support of plugging in modules. The most similar module I know is Module::Pluggable

Re: what namespace for future new module ?

2005-03-10 Thread David Landgren
Ofer Nave wrote: A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Cédric Bouvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-10 10:25]: Thank you for the hint. I quickly looked on CPAN and there doesn't seem to be many modules under Cluster::, besides Cluster::Init which is more geared towards High Availability. I don't find Cluster

Re: what namespace for future new module ?

2005-03-10 Thread Ofer Nave
A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Cédric Bouvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-10 10:25]: Thank you for the hint. I quickly looked on CPAN and there doesn't seem to be many modules under Cluster::, besides Cluster::Init which is more geared towards High Availability. I don't find Cluster:: sounds right.

Re: what namespace for future new module ?

2005-03-10 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Cédric Bouvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-10 10:25]: > Thank you for the hint. I quickly looked on CPAN and there > doesn't seem to be many modules under Cluster::, besides > Cluster::Init which is more geared towards High Availability. I don't find Cluster:: sounds right. Parallel: alone isn

Re: what namespace for future new module ?

2005-03-10 Thread Cédric Bouvier
Le mercredi 9 mars 2005, à 22 heures 32, Spencer Ogden écrivait : > Seems the term used most often referring to something running in parallel > on multiple computers is Cluster. > Cluster::Server, > Cluster::Control... > > Spencer Ogden Thank you for the hint. I quickly looked on CPAN and ther