> On Apr 5, 2004, at 2:41 AM, Konovalov, Vadim wrote:
> > Could you please advice how can I inform to CPAN system that
> > TclTk-0.75 and
> > Tcl-Tk-0.76 are same module but different versions?
> > The problem is seen here: http://search.cpan.org/~vkon/
> >
> It's not a problem with CPAN itself, i
> Yeah, I actually wonder whether the two projects could be merged
> somehow. Is Geoffrey responsive to emails about EU::ModuleMaker?
Dunno. I only found out about EU::ModuleMaker yesterday.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Apr 5, 2004, at 2:41 AM, Konovalov, Vadim wrote:
Could you please advice how can I inform to CPAN system that
TclTk-0.75 and
Tcl-Tk-0.76 are same module but different versions?
The problem is seen here: http://search.cpan.org/~vkon/
The problem appears right after changing name in Makefile.PL
On Apr 5, 2004, at 3:18 PM, Mark Stosberg wrote:
I think would useful to include "ExtUtils::ModuleMaker" in a SEE ALSO
section, and explain the key differences. At first glance the projects
seem quite similar.
Yeah, I actually wonder whether the two projects could be merged
somehow. Is Geoffrey
Andy Lester wrote:
I've just released Module::Starter 0.02, meant as a replacement for h2xs.
I think h2xs is very out of date as far as current best practices for
modules. It's also very intimidating for people who just want to create
a module, and have no need for all the compiler hoohah that h2
Andy Lester wrote:
I've just released Module::Starter 0.02, meant as a replacement for h2xs.
I just reinstalled Debian on my laptop with the default perl (5.6.1).
The following are the modules required and "requested" for
Module::Starter and its dependents. Not complaining or making any
judgemen
> Could you please advice how can I inform to CPAN system that TclTk-0.75 and
> Tcl-Tk-0.76 are same module but different versions?
Re-upload it with the same distribution name.
Currently CPAN is treating two uploads as two distributions, just because they
were distributed under different names:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 02:15:30PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> I've just released Module::Starter 0.02, meant as a replacement for h2xs.
>
> I think h2xs is very out of date as far as current best practices for
> modules. It's also very intimidating for people who just want to create
> a module,
I've just released Module::Starter 0.02, meant as a replacement for h2xs.
I think h2xs is very out of date as far as current best practices for
modules. It's also very intimidating for people who just want to create
a module, and have no need for all the compiler hoohah that h2xs throws
at you.
> there's 'prove -h' and 'perldoc prove', making things much easier to
> learn and lookup.
And, for that matter, prove --man == perldoc prove
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 05:05:34PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy Lester) writes:
> > Sure, and you can turn on HARNESS_VERBOSE to get the raw output of the
> > .t file. prove puts all that stuff behind easy command-line switches,
> > and lets you specify wildcards, and lets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy Lester) writes:
> Sure, and you can turn on HARNESS_VERBOSE to get the raw output of the
> .t file. prove puts all that stuff behind easy command-line switches,
> and lets you specify wildcards, and lets you specify a directory that
> implicitly does all the *.t within the
> $ make test TEST_FILES=t/mytest.t
Sure, and you can turn on HARNESS_VERBOSE to get the raw output of the
.t file. prove puts all that stuff behind easy command-line switches,
and lets you specify wildcards, and lets you specify a directory that
implicitly does all the *.t within the directory
* Andy Lester [2004/04/02 16:59]:
> Sure, but even better is to run only the tests that need to be run,
> which is a key part of prove. You can run "prove -Mblib t/mytest.t"
> instead of the entire "make test" suite.
$ make test TEST_FILES=t/mytest.t
(darren)
--
An idea is not responsible f
I've decided to use Config::Frontend as namespace.
Best regards,
Hans
Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema wrote:
I know, Config.pm would not be a good thing to replace ;-).
I've been looking around quite a lot lately. And I must say, I didn't
find a Configuration module that provided a single interface to m
Could you please advice how can I inform to CPAN system that TclTk-0.75 and
Tcl-Tk-0.76 are same module but different versions?
The problem is seen here: http://search.cpan.org/~vkon/
The problem appears right after changing name in Makefile.PL
Best regards,
Vadim Konovalov,
16 matches
Mail list logo
