[BENCHMARK] Server Resources

2005-01-14 Thread sofadmin
First let me apologize if this is not the appropriate forum for my question. I thought it would be because the issue has to do with apache/modperl/mysql performance. We have recently added a site to our server which hosts 30 other sites. The new site uses modperl & MySQL. After adding the new site

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources

2005-01-14 Thread sofadmin
Thanks for the suggestions. We are planning on migrating to Apache 2.0, but I need to read up on the implications to the various sites first. Do you think this server has enough resources to handle our sites without trouble? Sys >> >> But before I go any further with testing & modifying configur

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources

2005-01-15 Thread sofadmin
> Hey there > > It strikes me that your problem is directly related to memory usage. > Linux machines have a bad problem in that if your apache children get > swapped out ->for any reason at all<-, they will lose any shared memory > that they may have had before being swapped out. When they are s

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources

2005-01-15 Thread sofadmin
. > > Probably the biggest bang for the buck with the least effort or code > changes is to set up a lightweight (i.e. non-mod_perl) reverse proxy httpd > in front of the httpd that is running mod_perl: > Would you recommend squid or mod_proxy?

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application

2005-01-15 Thread sofadmin
Interesting, your comments on CGI::Session vs Apache::Session as I've had nothing but trouble with Apache::Session::File -- session data inconsistently being written to the file. Several years ago I first tried Apache::Session, but had the problem with data being saved in the session, so tried CGI:

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application

2005-01-16 Thread sofadmin
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Interesting, your comments on CGI::Session vs Apache::Session as I've >> had >> nothing but trouble with Apache::Session::File -- session data >> inconsistently being written to the file. > > I'm sorry to hear that. Did you mention those problems to the author or > b