[mp1] segfault with Perl 5.8.1 and mod_perl 1.29

2003-10-10 Thread Joachim Feise
Hi, on my Linux system (Slackware 9.0) Apache segfaults in mod_perl as soon as it receives the first request. This started after I upgraded to Perl 5.8.1 (from 5.6.0). The Apache version is 1.3.28, mod_perl 1.29. I appreciate any help. -Joe gdb backtrace: Starting program: /usr/var/lib/apache/bin

Re: [mp1] segfault with Perl 5.8.1 and mod_perl 1.29

2003-10-11 Thread Joachim Feise
Stas Bekman wrote: Joachim Feise wrote: Hi, on my Linux system (Slackware 9.0) Apache segfaults in mod_perl as soon as it receives the first request. This started after I upgraded to Perl 5.8.1 (from 5.6.0). The Apache version is 1.3.28, mod_perl 1.29. I appreciate any help. Joachim, Your

Re: [mp1] segfault with Perl 5.8.1 and mod_perl 1.29

2003-10-13 Thread Joachim Feise
Joachim Feise wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > >> Joachim Feise wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> on my Linux system (Slackware 9.0) Apache segfaults in mod_perl as >>> soon as it >>> receives the first request. >>> This started after

Re: [mp1] segfault with Perl 5.8.1 and mod_perl 1.29

2003-10-13 Thread Joachim Feise
Ged Haywood wrote: > Hi there, > > On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Joachim Feise wrote: > > >> perl Makefile.PL DYNAMIC=1 EVERYTHING=1 PERL_DEBUG=1 > > > Try compiling static? I tried it with perl Makefile.PL and perl Makefile.PL EVERYTHING=1 as well. No differe

Re: [mp1] segfault with Perl 5.8.1 and mod_perl 1.29

2003-10-13 Thread Joachim Feise
Randy Kobes wrote: > If I'm following correctly, you have 3 Perls: the original > 5.6.0, the stock 5.8.0, and the 5.8.1 that you're trying to > upgrade to. Might it happen that parts of the > build/install/running mix up some Perls? Can you move > (temporarily) all the other Perls out of the way, s

Re: [mp1] segfault with Perl 5.8.1 and mod_perl 1.29

2003-10-13 Thread Joachim Feise
Ged Haywood wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/mod_perl-1.29$ cat makepl_args.mod_perl > EVERYTHING=1 > DO_HTTPD=1 > USE_APACI=1 Thanks for the test. One thing that is different: I do not use DO_HTTPD=1, I rather build Apache by hand after building mod_perl, following the mod_perl INSTALL file: >>

Re: [mp1] segfault with Perl 5.8.1 and mod_perl 1.29 SOLVED

2003-10-14 Thread Joachim Feise
Ged Haywood wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/mod_perl-1.29$ cat makepl_args.mod_perl > EVERYTHING=1 > DO_HTTPD=1 > USE_APACI=1 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/mod_perl-1.29$ > = > > I'd be happy to give it a spin with differen

Re: [mp1] segfault with Perl 5.8.1 and mod_perl 1.29 SOLVED

2003-10-14 Thread Joachim Feise
Ged Haywood wrote: > > I think the docs could do with a patch... (hint:). While it is of course trivial to patch the docs, I think that's the wrong approach. What's the point of an option that has to have a specific value? If the USE_APACI=1 option is required, it no longer is an option and shoul

[mp1]Warning in Apache log w/mod_perl 1.29

2003-11-06 Thread Joachim Feise
Hi, using Perl 5.8.1, mod_perl 1.29, Apache 1.3.29, I see this warning in my Apache error log file whenever I start Apache: [Wed Nov 5 01:24:20 2003] CGI.pm: Constant subroutine CGI::XHTML_DTD redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.1/constant.pm line 108. [Wed Nov 5 01:24:21 2003] [notice] Apache/1.3.2

Re: [mp1]Warning in Apache log w/mod_perl 1.29

2003-11-06 Thread Joachim Feise
Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 16:49, Joachim Feise wrote: > >>using Perl 5.8.1, mod_perl 1.29, Apache 1.3.29, I see this warning in my >>Apache error log file whenever I start Apache: >>[Wed Nov 5 01:24:20 2003] CGI.pm: Constant subroutine CGI::XHTML_DTD

Re: [mp1]Warning in Apache log w/mod_perl 1.29

2003-11-11 Thread Joachim Feise
Perrin Harkins wrote on 11/11/2003 1:11 PM: > (Sorry, I didn't see your reply until now.) > > On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 19:04, Joachim Feise wrote: > >>> Are you usng PerlFreshRestart? >> >>Yes. > > > That's the reason you're having this p