Hi,
I am a bit confused.
If I do:
telnet localhost 80
I get:
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:53:29 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.52 (Fedora) <- Note no mod_perl here
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 3931
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
(sorry not sure if this is top or bottom post list)
My thought was that my apache is: Server version: Apache/2.0.52 and
my mod_perl is (according to yum):
mod_perl.i3861.99_16-3 installed
>From what I've read this shouldn't work.
On 28 Feb 2007 at 9:51, Juan Jose Natera wr
On
Can we draw any conclusions from this?
> Beginner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am a bit confused.
> >
> > If I do:
> > telnet localhost 80
> >
> >
> > I get:
> > HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
> > Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:53:29 GMT
> >
On 1 Mar 2007 at 8:40, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Beginner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a number of handler configured like so:
> >
Apache2::Const qw(OK DECLINED NOT_FOUND);
>
> I don't see how this could work if you're really running mod_per
Hi,
In case anyone if following all the threads, this is a separate
system from the one I mailed about earlier.
I am attempting to get started with SOAP and mod_perl. I have
Apache/2.0.54
I installed SOAP::Transport::HTTP::Apache using
perl -MCPAN -e 'install ...'
During the build process I n
On 13 Apr 2007 at 7:25, Tyler Gee wrote:
> On 4/12/07, Bill Whillers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> I was just contsidering using SWF::Chart. Has anyone used that
> successfully or what issues would there be (other than the fact that
> it is flash).
Yes I have used it and found it
Hi,
I have been in this situation before but want to clarify something.
I have a vanilla RH4 install and wanted to check that mod_perl was
installed. So I did a test on port 80 ala:
telnet localhost 80
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1).
Escape character is '^]'.
On 25 Apr 2007 at 12:18, Carl Johnstone wrote:
> > I tried to the package manager to install mod_perl and it offers me
> > mod_perl-1.99-16.4
> >
> > I thought that Apache 2 required MP2. Am I mistaken? I am not sure
> > what the best route to take is, even my httpd server version is a bit
> > old
Hi,
I hope this isn't a dumb question.
I want to try and create a small REST style installation and was
considering how to overcome the problem of urls in the form
http://www.myfactory.com/parts/1234
The resource after /parts could in theory be any number but you would
not want to have a fo
> Beginner wrote:
> > On the face of it this is the sort of thing mod_perl should excel at.
> > Does it? Can you intercept requests like this one above? Which API
> > methods should I be looking at?
>
Take a look at CGI::Application using CGI::Application::Dispatch
&
Hi,
Server: Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.8
I got to work this morning at my httpd daemon was down. I was getting
a seg fault whenever I tried to restart the daemon. I found an
upgraded package for my OS. It looks like I had a apache2 with MP1
setup. The new installation is MP
On 17 Mar 2008 at 7:43, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Beginner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I found an
> > upgraded package for my OS.
>
> Do you mean that the OS auto-upgraded something, or that you upgraded
> something manually?
On 17 Mar 2008 at 12:56, Jeff Armstrong wrote:
> Dp,
>
> Make sure you are using etch or later:
> dpkg -l libapache2-mod-perl2
>
> should list the installed version as 2.0.2-2.4
>
>
> The sarge libapache2-mod-perl2 versions (1.99.xxx) were not sane.
Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) mod_perl/2.0.2 Pe
On 17 Mar 2008 at 10:38, Colin Wetherbee wrote:
> Colin Wetherbee wrote:
> > Beginner wrote:
> >> dpkg -l libapache2-mod-perl2 shows:
> >>
> >> ii libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.2-2.4
> >>
> >> It doesn't mention etch but I think this is
14 matches
Mail list logo
