Hello,
I am attempting to get a clean up-to-date install Apache with static
linked mod_perl (using current stable releases for Apache (2.2.17) and
mod_perl (2.0.5) from .tar.gz files download from respective
repositories) but am at a frustrating dead end. I am looking for any
suggestions as I
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Szekeres, Edward
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am attempting to get a clean up-to-date install Apache with static linked
> mod_perl (using current stable releases for Apache (2.2.17)
I didn't see the arguments you used to compile apache in here. But
would suggest using
Thanks for your replyclarifications
1) Perl 5.12.3 was compiled without thread support as per the mod_perl 2.0
installation directions
2) I have tried adding the "--with-included-apr" option without luck
2) As per the mod_perl documentation for static I am not pre-compiling Apache
but was
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Szekeres, Edward
wrote:
> Thanks for your replyclarifications
For what it is worth, I'd suggest building mp2 as a shared object;
this approach is very well tested. You may be able to build as a
static module, but that can take some additional effort, and that
FYI
Wanted to let you know I accidently stumbled on a something that worked, I had
noticed that if I ran the mod_perl config twice, the second time it ran it
would not show that apr directory-not-found error, however the make would fail
with some APR related errors, however, if I added the "
Moving an installation from Apache 1.3 to Apache 2.0.
I am trying to move an existing installation of a PERL code base (of
which I am not the original author) to Apache 2.0 to help address some
security concerns. For the most part I have found Apache2 equivalents
for most of the modules but h
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Szekeres, Edward
wrote:
> Moving an installation from Apache 1.3 to Apache 2.0.
>
> I am trying to move an existing installation of a PERL code base (of
> which I am not the original author) to Apache 2.0 to help address some
> security concerns. For the most
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:02 PM, E R wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
>> Are you using the A::S that's in the repo? It has fixes for calculating
>> sizes...
>
> Using RSS-SHARED instead of VSIZE-SHARED should fix the x86_64 issue I'm
> seeing.
>
> But I've got som
