On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 00:53 -0500, Sean P Quinlan wrote:
> OK, this is probably just a dumb programmer error on my part, but it
> is now almost 1am for me and I can't find anything in the docs.
> I have a mod_perl (Apache & mod_perl 2 on SuSE 10.1) module destined
> to handle a requests for a set
Sean P Quinlan wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 00:53 -0500, Sean P Quinlan wrote:
>
>
>>OK, this is probably just a dumb programmer error on my part, but it
>>is now almost 1am for me and I can't find anything in the docs.
>>I have a mod_perl (Apache & mod_perl 2 on SuSE 10.1) module destined
>>to
Andy Armstrong wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2007, at 17:05, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> Why would anyone use this instead of CGI.pm?
>
> If you expect me to justify it you've got the wrong guy Randal :)
>
> Ovid reckons people use it so I pitched in to try and fix it. The code
> is quite nasty in places -
On 10 Jan 2007, at 17:19, Mark Stosberg wrote:
I still like the CGI::Simple is lighter weight, but it just didn't
work
well enough for me. (I'm sorry my memory doesn't recall the exact
issues
anymore... it may have been related to file uploading.)
Ring any bells?
http://rt.cpan.org/Public
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks,
On the Perl Modules Authors list yesterday Ovid wrote:
Has anyone heard from James Freeman, the maintainer of CGI::Simple
(http://search.cpan.org/dist/Cgi-Simple/)? It's not been updated in a
couple of years, the outstanding bugs appear
> "Andy" == Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Has anyone heard from James Freeman, the maintainer of CGI::Simple
>> (http://search.cpan.org/dist/Cgi-Simple/)? It's not been updated in a
>> couple of years, the outstanding bugs appear to mostly be related to
>> the same issue, and
On 10 Jan 2007, at 17:05, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Why would anyone use this instead of CGI.pm?
If you expect me to justify it you've got the wrong guy Randal :)
Ovid reckons people use it so I pitched in to try and fix it. The
code is quite nasty in places - but I'll fix it if people like
Andy Armstrong wrote:
> Part of my reason for posting is to try and work out whether anyone's
> actually using it.
I'd say the user's of it on this list would be pretty small. But I've heard it's
popular for normal CGI folks and people using FCGI since they can save on memory
and can't use the
On 10 Jan 2007, at 17:13, Michael Peters wrote:
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Part of my reason for posting is to try and work out whether anyone's
actually using it.
I'd say the user's of it on this list would be pretty small. But
I've heard it's
popular for normal CGI folks and people using FCGI
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 10 Jan 2007, at 17:13, Michael Peters wrote:
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Part of my reason for posting is to try and work out whether anyone's
actually using it.
I'd say the user's of it on this list would be pretty
small. But I've heard it's popular
On 10 Jan 2007, at 17:58, Randy Kobes wrote:
I started here because the bugs related to it not working with
mod_perl. So I figured I'd, you know, ask mod_perl people :)
One place to perhaps start is the mod_perl tests. In
particular, one could switch the t/modules/cgi*.t
tests (and correspondi
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 14:12 +, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> It turns out the main bugs he's referring to are:
>
> http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=23519 "new modperl breaks
> API again"
> http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=11896 "parameters missing
> with latest mod_perl"
Maybe
It seems like they're mutually exclusive technologies.
Can they both be installed in one Apache server to good effect?
I'm sorry if this is the wrong list for this question. I'm asking here
because I use an Apache2 mod_perl2/libapreq2 build as our application
server (static apache front end usi
Hi,
I made a test with your code, yes it works,
But I have other things to ask:
Script1:
package PrintIp;
#use mod_perl2 ();
use Apache2::Const qw(:common);
#use Apache2::Request ();
use Apache2::RequestRec ();
sub handler {
my $r= shift;
#my $apr= Apache2::Requ
On Jan 10, 2007, at 8:56 PM, silent wrote:
Mod_perl objects sometimes very confuse to me, for example: the
Apache2::Connection pod only say :$c->method, but what is $c?
I only guess it is $c = $r->connection,(or you can say research the
src
code)
Is there something like a big picture show th
Boysenberry Payne wrote:
It seems like they're mutually exclusive technologies.
Can they both be installed in one Apache server to good effect?
AxKit requires mod_perl. Maybe you mean AxKit2? It has its own HTTP
server and doesn't interact with Apache or mod_perl. There's no reason
you ca
Hi,
My objective is to update the REMOTE_USER variable within the perl module
and check whether
it is set in side CGI script by refering to the variable
$ENV{'REMOTE_USER'}.
I was successful setting value withing the module but $ENV{'REMOTE_USER'}
inside the CGI prints nothing (empty). Why does
Hi,
Perrin is right with AxKit you have the following possibilities:
- Apache1+mod_perl1+AxKit1
- Apache2+mod_perl2 <=> AxKit2 (maybe a proxy in between)
But there is also Apache2::TomKit
(http://search.cpan.org/~tomson/Apache2-TomKit-0.01_6/lib/Apache2/TomKit.pm):
- Apache2+mod_perl2+Apache2::To
18 matches
Mail list logo
