Wrong list, I know, but I figure mod_perl people will have come accross
this more than anyone.
Is there any reason the CPAN Apache2::Request has a dependency on
mod_perl (as opposed to mod_perl2) ?
Doing a clean mp2 install I have to ensure all its other dependencies
are met, then install it
John ORourke wrote:
Wrong list, I know, but I figure mod_perl people will have come accross
this more than anyone.
Actually, I've yet to actually install mod_perl for libapreq from CPAN.
I always compile from source :)
Is there any reason the CPAN Apache2::Request has a dependency on
mod_perl
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 14:17 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Sagar R. Shah wrote:
> > t/apache/content_length_header.t 271 3.70% 17
> > t/api/status.t 62 33.33% 4-5
> These are expected and fixed already in SVN (me). 2.0.3 will include
Sagar Shah wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 14:17 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Sagar R. Shah wrote:
t/apache/content_length_header.t 271 3.70% 17
t/api/status.t 62 33.33% 4-5
These are expected and fixed already in SVN (me). 2.0.3 wi
hi.
I have a problem whit upload files.
I have the last version for this packages:
CGI 3.20
libapreq2 2.07
HTML::Mason 1.32
and I use a simple code in mason for upload:
<%args>
$fitxer => undef
<% $content %>
<%init>
my $content = '';
if($fitxer){
Are the apr-ext tests even that important? The reguard "apr" test do
pass. Is mod_perl considered not safe to use because of the apr-ext
test failures?
On 6/22/06, Philip M. Gollucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick Rutkowski wrote:
> Are the t/apr-ext/*.t tests supposed to fail? No matter how
Patrick M. Rutkowski wrote:
Are the apr-ext tests even that important? The reguard "apr" test do
pass. Is mod_perl considered not safe to use because of the apr-ext
test failures?
From the looks of it, looks like its a test suite problem.
You always try to do one of the things the tests do from
