On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:23, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > + my $foo = 123;
> > + $r->pnotes('foo' => $foo);
> > + $foo = 456;
> > + $r->pnotes('foo') # <== now 456 (in 2.0.2)
> > + $r->pnotes('foo') # <== left at 123 (in 2.0.3)
>
> actually, I'm re-thinking my stance on this. a common use of pno
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:55, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 12:23 -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > I actually thing that would be somewhat common. and as I understand
> > things, the fix would require the middle step to be
> >
> > -- next handler
> > my $o = $r->pnotes('foo
crazy. i used to use postgres extensively @work - my CTO was real
big on it.
we moved over to mysql when he left, because it was easier for me to
staff projects based on it, and we didn't need triggers or stored
procedures. I had no idea about the invalid data - i just checked
some ol
