Re: Dynamic VirtualHost's

2005-03-04 Thread Marc GrĂ cia
Well, In our case, the server doesn't have any mod_perl apps. Only uses mod_perl (Or perl sections, i don't really know if it's the same) to dinamicaly generate the virtualhosts. That apache2 acts as a reverse proxy to controls several httpd servers  in the private lan with the mod_perl ap

Re: [BUG] A few tests fail on RC4/5.6.1/Apache 1.3.26

2005-03-04 Thread Dominique Quatravaux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stas Bekman wrote: | | Dominique, your report misses an essential info. Please review: | http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/help/help.html#_C_make_test___Failures | | | | Thanks. | Sorry (again). t/apache/content_length_header.1..27 # testing : GET /T

Re: Win32 + ModPerl 2 + Apache 2 + NPH script = confusing header situation

2005-03-04 Thread Tom Schindl
Formhandle wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Please upgrade first to the latest mod_perl (2.0.0-RC4 or 1.999.21) and then try again: http://perl.apache.org/download/index.html http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/os/win32/install.html I tried but the PPM package was not available anywhere. I don't have the

segmentation fault

2005-03-04 Thread Octavian Rasnita
Hi, I am using a very simple program which gets some data from a MySQL table, prints a form and that data. The server is: Apache/2.0.52 (Unix) PHP/5.0.2 mod_perl/1.99_19 Perl/v5.8.4 Server at 10.50.28.50 Port 80 Sometimes the program works fine, but very often it gives a 404 Not Found error. I

Verify mod_perl installation

2005-03-04 Thread Octavian Rasnita
Hi, Is there a way to test if mod_perl 2.0 was installed correctly? I have some problems with a program and I think mod_perl installation might be the source. Thank you. Teddy

Re: segmentation fault

2005-03-04 Thread Ian Joyce
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:57:59 +0200, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > I remember that when I have installed mod_perl, I couldn't install it using > "make test" because it gave me some errors, so I have used just "make > install". > It gave me some errors that time that I couldn'

Re: Win32 + ModPerl 2 + Apache 2 + NPH script = confusing header situation

2005-03-04 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Tom Schindl wrote: > Formhandle wrote: > > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > >> Please upgrade first to the latest mod_perl (2.0.0-RC4 or 1.999.21) > >> and then try again: > >> http://perl.apache.org/download/index.html > >> http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/os/win32/install.html > > > >

Re: segmentation fault

2005-03-04 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Octavian Rasnita wrote: > Hi, > > I am using a very simple program which gets some data from a MySQL table, > prints a form and that data. > > The server is: > Apache/2.0.52 (Unix) PHP/5.0.2 mod_perl/1.99_19 Perl/v5.8.4 Server at > 10.50.28.50 Port 80 > > Sometimes the program

Re: Verify mod_perl installation

2005-03-04 Thread Tom Schindl
Hmm, the test-suite comming with mod_perl, download? Tom Octavian Rasnita wrote: Hi, Is there a way to test if mod_perl 2.0 was installed correctly? I have some problems with a program and I think mod_perl installation might be the source. Thank you. Teddy

Re: Win32 + ModPerl 2 + Apache 2 + NPH script = confusing header situation

2005-03-04 Thread Tom Schindl
Randy Kobes wrote: On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Tom Schindl wrote: [...] has it to be perl 5.6.x? We are now at 5.8.6. You can get it from http://www.activestate.com/Products/ActivePerl/ and then you can get the ppms as described in the URL above. In fact, for mod_perl-2 (Apache/2.0.x), perl-5.8.x (ie,

Re: Win32 + ModPerl 2 + Apache 2 + NPH script = confusing header situation

2005-03-04 Thread Stas Bekman
Formhandle wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Please upgrade first to the latest mod_perl (2.0.0-RC4 or 1.999.21) and then try again: http://perl.apache.org/download/index.html http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/os/win32/install.html [...] Please keep in mind I'm a self-taught programmer and, contrary to comm

Re: [BUG] A few tests fail on RC4/5.6.1/Apache 1.3.26

2005-03-04 Thread Stas Bekman
Dominique Quatravaux wrote: t/apache/content_length_header.1..27 # testing : GET /TestApache__content_length_header C-L header # expected: 0 # received: undef not ok 2 # testing : GET /TestApache__content_length_header?set_content_length C-L header # expected: 0 # received: 25 not ok 5 # testing :

Re: [BUG MP1/MP2] Apache should bail out in case of syntax errors in section

2005-03-04 Thread Dominique Quatravaux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stas Bekman wrote: | Unfortunately we can't have a test for this, since if the test | suite doesn't start, we have a problem :( There should be a special | small test suite for that I suppose. I've cobbled the following together for this purpose, see be

Re: [BUG] A few tests fail on RC4/5.6.1/Debian Apache 2.0.52-3

2005-03-04 Thread Dominique Quatravaux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stas Bekman wrote: | Take a look at t/apache/content_length_header.t that's where you | can see that httpd 2.1 has changed behavior. True. Search'n-replacing of "have_min_apache_version(2.1)" with "1" cures the problem. | What's confusing is that your s

Re: [BUG] A few tests fail on RC4/5.6.1/Debian Apache 2.0.52-3

2005-03-04 Thread Stas Bekman
Dominique Quatravaux wrote: [...] | whereas your report says Apache 2.0.52, whereas the error indicates | that you really run Apache 2.1.x. [...] Dominique, did you build | Apache by yourself? No indeed. This is apache2-mpm-prefork 2.0.52-3 from Debian testing, not the latest version in testing ei

[Fwd: ApacheCon Europe 2005: Call for Presenters deadline extended!]

2005-03-04 Thread Stas Bekman
FYI Original Message Subject: ApacheCon Europe 2005: Call for Presenters deadline extended! Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:29:27 -0400 From: Lars Eilebrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: The Apache Software Foundation To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Call for Participation: ApacheCon Europe 20

Re: [BUG] A few tests fail on RC4/5.6.1/Debian Apache 2.0.52-3

2005-03-04 Thread Damon Buckwalter
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:07:36 -0500, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | Is it possible that you have Apache 2.0.x with some special patches > > | from 2.1.x applied to it? My guess is that this is the case. In > > | which case there is nothing we can do about it, since you aren't > > | ru

Problem using Cleanuphandler for SizeLimit

2005-03-04 Thread victor
Hello everyone, I just bump into something strange I wonder if anyone else here have experienced it or better have a fix. I have been using SizeLimit with FixupHandler since day one and it has been working wonderful, recently I noticed the documention have been changed now the CleanupHandler be

Re: Problem using Cleanuphandler for SizeLimit

2005-03-04 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 17:24 +0800, victor wrote: > I have been using SizeLimit with FixupHandler since day one and it has > been working wonderful, recently I noticed the documention have been > changed now the CleanupHandler become the prefered choice of handler to > handle SizeLimit. It still

Re: Win32 + ModPerl 2 + Apache 2 + NPH script = confusing header situation

2005-03-04 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Stas Bekman wrote: > Formhandle wrote: > > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > >> Please upgrade first to the latest mod_perl (2.0.0-RC4 or 1.999.21) > >> and then try again: > >> http://perl.apache.org/download/index.html > >> http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/os/win32/install.html > [...]