Stan suggested that I try the CVS version, which I did.
I reported that its make procedure has a problem finding
httpd.
Meanwhile, I looked more closely at what happens when
I try to make the CVS version (output appended below)
and I noticed several other strange things.
1) META.yml is missing from
Jon Forrest wrote:
Stan suggested that I try the CVS version, which I did.
I reported that its make procedure has a problem finding
httpd.
Did you try building the DSO version? Did it work for you?
Meanwhile, I looked more closely at what happens when
I try to make the CVS version (output appended
Well, i have created an Object Session, now how can i get it again?
tie %sesion, 'Apache::Session::Postgres', undef, {
DataSource => 'dbi:Pg:dbname=sessions',
UserName => $bd->{user},
Password => '',
Commit => 1
};
through a Cookie or something
Stas Bekman wrote:
Jon Forrest wrote:
Stan suggested that I try the CVS version, which I did.
I reported that its make procedure has a problem finding
httpd.
Sorry for calling you Stan, Stas.
Did you try building the DSO version? Did it work for you?
It builds but make test fails for the reason I o
Jon Forrest wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Jon Forrest wrote:
Stan suggested that I try the CVS version, which I did.
I reported that its make procedure has a problem finding
httpd.
Sorry for calling you Stan, Stas.
No worries :)
Did you try building the DSO version? Did it work for you?
It builds but
If you are running 2.0.51, you want to upgrade to 2.0.52 as soon as
possible because of the security related flaw introduced in 2.0.51.
For more details see:
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.html
http://httpd.apache.org/.
--
__
OK, Apache 2.0.52 is out, could you please report that these tests pass
with that version (unpatched!) and the current modperl-2.0 cvs?
t/filter/both_str_con_add.t t/protocol/echo_block.t
t/protocol/echo_filter.t t/protocol/pseudo_http.t
Please send one report on NetBSD and one more on OpenBSD
(I'm not sure if I should continue posting these reports
to the list. Please let me know if I should send them to just
you.)
Stas Bekman wrote:
Oh, sorry, for some reason I thought you were talking about the static
build. Could you please post the output of:
t/TEST -conf -trace=debug
I downloaded
Jon Forrest wrote:
(I'm not sure if I should continue posting these reports
to the list. Please let me know if I should send them to just
you.)
Yes, please always post those to the list. If the files are too big and
you can upload them somewhere and send a link here, that works too. We
need to ke
