Has anyone ever had trouble with SDBM_File not being able to open dbm
files created under mod_perl from a command line script? I noticed that
apache 1.x seems to include an sdbm library, and I wonder if that is
being used by mod_perl, making the dbm file it writes incompatible with
the sdbm librar
Hi Perrin,
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Has anyone ever had trouble with SDBM_File not being able to open dbm
> files created under mod_perl from a command line script?
Stupid question: this isn't the old "first 4k not getting flushed"
file locking bug?
73
Ged.
--
Reporting
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 18:59, Ged Haywood wrote:
> Stupid question: this isn't the old "first 4k not getting flushed"
> file locking bug?
I don't see how it could be. The mod_perl code unties the file after
using it.
The message I get is "panic: sv_setpvn called with negative strlen" and
it does
Hi Perrin,
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > file locking bug?
>
> The mod_perl code unties the file after using it.
>
> The message I get is "panic: sv_setpvn called with negative strlen"
Yikes! Misconfigured build, nasty bug, linked with wrong library...??
73,
Ged.
--
Repo
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 18:59, Ged Haywood wrote:
Stupid question: this isn't the old "first 4k not getting flushed"
file locking bug?
That was an issue with Berkley DB (via DB_File), not SDBM_File, AFAIK.
I don't see how it could be. The mod_perl code unties the file after
Hi guys,
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I think perl brings in its own SDBM implementation
Another one: is mod_ssl involved anywhere?
>From mod_ssl-2.8.16-1.3.29/INSTALL
NOTE: The --enable-rule=SSL_SDBM option enabled the use of the
built-in SDBM library instead of a custom de
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 19:45, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I'm not familiar with SDBM guts, but it could be that mod_perl and perl have a
> different idea about some data type used by SDBM. like 32/64 bits so LFS could
> be an issue. Are you sure it's the same perl?
At first I thought it wasn't, but stri
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 19:45, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'm not familiar with SDBM guts, but it could be that mod_perl and perl have a
different idea about some data type used by SDBM. like 32/64 bits so LFS could
be an issue. Are you sure it's the same perl?
At first I thought i
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
I am trying to port Mason to mod_perl2 w/libapreq2. It seems I have munged it
up. When 'stressing' the site (downloading a Mason-enabled uri with
wget in a looping shell script), I get lots of
Attempt to f
Beau E. Cox wrote:
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
I am trying to port Mason to mod_perl2 w/libapreq2. It seems I have munged it
up. When 'stressing' the site (downloading a Mason-enabled uri with
wget in a looping shell script), I get lot
10 matches
Mail list logo