So I bought Panther the other day. Turns out apple have done the right
thing this time and shipped with the latest Apache. Which is great, I
remember the rigmarole I went through with Jaguar to get a working
Apache/mod_perl/libapreq set up. However, they have not shipped the
latest mod_perl.
A
At 09:49 2003-10-27 +0600, you wrote:
Hello!
I have a problem and can't get it how to solve it.
When I'm using 'use Module;' in if..elsif statement I've got situation when
all modules is included.
'use' loads modules at compile time. To load modules conditionally, at
runtime, try 'require' instead
El lunes, 27 octu, 2003, a las 11:04 Europe/Madrid, Mark Hawkes
escribió:
At 09:49 2003-10-27 +0600, you wrote:
Hello!
I have a problem and can't get it how to solve it.
When I'm using 'use Module;' in if..elsif statement I've got
situation when
all modules is included.
'use' loads modules at co
At 11:04 2003-10-27 +0100, you wrote:
At 09:49 2003-10-27 +0600, you wrote:
Hello!
I have a problem and can't get it how to solve it.
When I'm using 'use Module;' in if..elsif statement I've got situation when
all modules is included.
'use' loads modules at compile time. To load modules conditional
Hi,
how do I enable File-uploads in mod_perl1.99 for Apache2?
In Apache 1.3 I had to change some variables in Apache::Request but
Apache::Request is not ported right now. How do I do it? I looked in the
documentation, but it was not mentioned there, so, perhaps you can help
me.
Thanks in advance
At 08:41 AM 10/26/2003 +, Ged Haywood wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Robert Friberg wrote:
>
>> rather old Red Hat Linux, RH 6.0 on intel.
>> [snip]
>> Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) (Red Hat/Linux) mod_perl/1.21
>
>Ouch. They do need upgrading.
>
>> Besides some occasional and seemingly rand
Danial Pearce wrote:
So I bought Panther the other day. Turns out apple have done the right
thing this time and shipped with the latest Apache. Which is great, I
remember the rigmarole I went through with Jaguar to get a working
Apache/mod_perl/libapreq set up. However, they have not shipped the
Volker Kroll wrote:
Hi,
how do I enable File-uploads in mod_perl1.99 for Apache2?
In Apache 1.3 I had to change some variables in Apache::Request but
Apache::Request is not ported right now. How do I do it? I looked in the
documentation, but it was not mentioned there, so, perhaps you can help
me.
Hello All,
I need help with mod_perl
My production servers has RedHat 8.0 and 9.0 using Perl, Apache and mod_perl
RedHat rpms.
What is your suggestion for a production server ?
In others emails I read that perl 5.8.1 with Apache 1.3.28 and mod_perl 1.28
is the best stable solution for a produ
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:38:06PM -0400, Alejandro Galue wrote:
> I need help with mod_perl
http://perl.apache.org/
> My production servers has RedHat 8.0 and 9.0 using Perl, Apache and mod_perl
> RedHat rpms.
>
> What is your suggestion for a production server ?
>
> In others emails I re
1. Problem Description:
I am attempting to install mod_perl with apache 2.0.45 and experiencing some
difficulty. I am using mod_perl-1.99_09 because anything beyond that requires
apache 2.0.46 or greater. The install process is listed below. Everything seems
to work fine until I attempt to
Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:38:06PM -0400, Alejandro Galue wrote:
My production servers has RedHat 8.0 and 9.0 using Perl, Apache and mod_perl
RedHat rpms.
What is your suggestion for a production server ?
In others emails I read that perl 5.8.1 with Apache 1.3.28 and m
Lanny Derby wrote:
1. Problem Description:
I am attempting to install mod_perl with apache 2.0.45 and experiencing some
difficulty. I am using mod_perl-1.99_09 because anything beyond that
requires apache 2.0.46 or greater. The install process is listed below.
Everything seems to work fine until I
[please remember to reply back to the list, and not to the person who answered
your question. Thanks]
Lanny Derby wrote:
Thank you... i think...
I am using mod_perl-1.99_09 because anything beyond that (i.e. mod
perl-1.99_10)
requires apache 2.0.46 or greater and I am running apache 2.0.45.
So
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Angela wrote:
[ ... ]
> I think(?) the issue is that the browser doesn’t know the
> contents because the header returned is a wap header i.e.
> 'Content-Type: text/vnd.wap.wml'. The browser then assumes
> it's a file download and promptly does just that! Although
> having said
15 matches
Mail list logo