Patrick Rutkowski wrote:
> t/apr-ext/brigade.../home/rutski89/opt/perl/bin/perl:/home/rutski89/opt/kit/mod_perl-2.0.2/blib/arch/auto/APR/Pool/Pool.so:
> undefined symbol 'apr_pool_cleanup_null'
I'm recently (as of today) in a position to trouble shoot this
NetBSD 3.0 encout
Patrick M. Rutkowski wrote:
Are the apr-ext tests even that important? The reguard "apr" test do
pass. Is mod_perl considered not safe to use because of the apr-ext
test failures?
From the looks of it, looks like its a test suite problem.
You always try to do one of the things the tests do from
Are the apr-ext tests even that important? The reguard "apr" test do
pass. Is mod_perl considered not safe to use because of the apr-ext
test failures?
On 6/22/06, Philip M. Gollucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick Rutkowski wrote:
> Are the t/apr-ext/*.t tests supposed to fail? No matter how
Patrick Rutkowski wrote:
Are the t/apr-ext/*.t tests supposed to fail? No matter how hard to try
I always get this on OpenBSD 3.9 with perl 5.8.8, Apache-2.2.2 and
mod_perl-2:
I think its due a lack of testing on openbsd. I don't think any of the
developers
have an openbsd box handy. I do at
Are the t/apr-ext/*.t tests supposed to fail? No matter how hard to
try I always get this on OpenBSD 3.9 with perl 5.8.8, Apache-2.2.2
and mod_perl-2:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List
of Failed
-
