On Mon 06 Apr 2009, André Warnier wrote:
> How does it work with Apache children/threads that may be acting as a
> VirtualHost's having their own ErrorLog ?
> My experience is that anything logged by mod_perl modules running
> "in" a VirtualHost using explicit warn() or $r->log_error() or
> $r->log
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
[...]
On Linux the ErrorLog of the base server is always opened on file
descriptor 2 that means stderr. So, a reader that reads this stream
gets everything (under normal conditions) that Apache, Perl or any XS
module writes to stderr.
Hi Torsten, just jumping in her
On Sun 05 Apr 2009, E R wrote:
> My concern is about what happens in this scenario:
>
> 1. Set everything up (named pipe, logger process, etc.)
> 2. Now suppose the logger process dies (it crashes or I need to
> restart it) 3. Any writes through existing connections to the named
> pipe will just fa
Hi Torsten,
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Torsten Foertsch
wrote:
>
> And later on it does not check the return code when writing the log:
>
> httpd-2.2.11/server/log.c:682:
> apr_file_puts(errstr, logf);
> apr_file_flush(logf);
My concern is about what happens in this scenario:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:22 PM, E R wrote:
> I want to send all error output to a process for specialized logging.
> I know that you can use CustomLog with a pipe. However, will that
> capture output from things like 'print STDERR ...' or if an XS module
> directly writes to stderr? I need that ou
On Sat 04 Apr 2009, E R wrote:
> One operational issue with this is that if the logger process dies,
> existing httpd processes will get a SIGPIPE signal on subsequent
> writes. Restarting the logger process does not restore the lost
> connections.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Torsten Foe
One operational issue with this is that if the logger process dies,
existing httpd processes will get a SIGPIPE signal on subsequent
writes. Restarting the logger process does not restore the lost
connections.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Torsten Foertsch
wrote:
> On Fri 03 Apr 2009, E R wro
On Fri 03 Apr 2009, E R wrote:
> I want to send all error output to a process for specialized logging.
> I know that you can use CustomLog with a pipe. However, will that
> capture output from things like 'print STDERR ...' or if an XS module
> directly writes to stderr? I need that output to also
I want to send all error output to a process for specialized logging.
I know that you can use CustomLog with a pipe. However, will that
capture output from things like 'print STDERR ...' or if an XS module
directly writes to stderr? I need that output to also go to my logging
process.
Does anyone
