>
it?thanks.> > - Original Message
-> *From:*
Jason J. Czerak <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> *To:* modperl@perl.apache.org
<mailto:modperl@perl.apache.org>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 16,
2006 4:28 AM>
*Subject:
PM
Subject: Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache
2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3
Note what I left in this reply... I suppose I should of
been more explicit in what I tried. AcriveState perl fails quicker then
perl.org perl binaries that I found.On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 10:43
+0800, Foo Ji-Haw wrote
*From:* Jason J.
Czerak <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
*To:* modperl@perl.apache.org <mailto:modperl@perl.apache.org>>
*Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:28 AM>
*Subject:* mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3>
> I have a
Excellent! Coding perl (this makes content relevant) allow you to ski Whistler/Blackcomb?
>>> Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16-Feb-06 09:56:51 AM >>>
Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> No, I'm saying modules that have been upgraded to 8.7 may no longer work> in a 5.6 envirnoment.
rom:* Jason J. Czerak <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* modperl@perl.apache.org <mailto:modperl@perl.apache.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:28 AM
> *Subject:* mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3
>
> I have an ap
Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I'm saying modules that have been upgraded to 8.7 may no longer work
> in a 5.6 envirnoment. Mine didn't.
Ahh. I'd upgrade to 5.8 in that case. ;-)
> Way cool. Where (geographically) ru?
Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- T
No, I'm saying modules that have been upgraded to 8.7 may no longer work in a 5.6 envirnoment. Mine didn't.
Way cool. Where (geographically) ru?>>> Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16-Feb-06 08:56:17 AM >>
I'm kind-of confused here... are you saying that activeperl 8xxbuilds don't have
ygwin ?
- Original Message -
From: Jason J. Czerak
To: modperl@perl.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:28 AM
Subject: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin W
Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the office, installing ActivePerl just annoyed the sysadmins because it
> didn't really break anything but I found myself in the position of begin
> able to take advantage of some pretty cool modules (like IO::ALL, e.g.)
> that have been upgraded or de
>
> At the office, installing ActivePerl just annoyed the sysadmins
> because it didn't really break anything but I found myself in the
> position of begin able to take advantage of some pretty cool modules
> (like IO::ALL, e.g.) that have been upgraded or designed for 5.8 when
> the infrastruct
ivePerl instead of cygwin ?> > Is there any free version of ActivePerl£¿or how much should I pay for> it?thanks.> > - Original Message -> *From:* Jason J. Czerak <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> *To:* modperl@perl.apache.org <mailto:modperl@perl.apache.or
J. Czerak <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* modperl@perl.apache.org <mailto:modperl@perl.apache.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:28 AM
> *Subject:* mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3
>
> I have an application that is based on
+ Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3
I have an application that is based on Apache::ASP. Apache::ASP requires Apache2::porting and Apache2::compat to be in the startup.pl.Everything is working very well. I some how got mod_perl to build and running with out a segfault. This is good. The issue is when st
Why don't you try ActivePerl instead of cygwin
?
- Original Message -
From:
Jason J. Czerak
To: modperl@perl.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:28
AM
Subject: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55
on Cygwin Win2k3
I have an application that is bas
I have an application that is based on Apache::ASP. Apache::ASP requires Apache2::porting and Apache2::compat to be in the startup.pl.
Everything is working very well. I some how got mod_perl to build and running with out a segfault. This is good. The issue is when startup.pl is called, either
15 matches
Mail list logo
