Le mardi 17 avril 2012 à 10:04 -0700, Fred Moyer a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Vincent Veyron wrote:
> > Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 à 13:14 -0400, eric.b...@barclays.com a écrit :
> >> Well, finding (good) developers is certainly an issue.
> >>
> > Over the years, I have seen more than
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Vincent Veyron wrote:
> Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 à 13:14 -0400, eric.b...@barclays.com a écrit :
>> Well, finding (good) developers is certainly an issue.
>>
> Over the years, I have seen more than one of those being driven out of
> the field by the inane management
Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 à 13:14 -0400, eric.b...@barclays.com a écrit :
> Well, finding (good) developers is certainly an issue.
>
Over the years, I have seen more than one of those being driven out of
the field by the inane management that most developers toil under. And
considering how demanding
On 12 Apr 2012, at 18:14,
wrote:
> Well, finding (good) developers is certainly an issue.
>
> Here in NYC, it's very difficult to find proper Perl programmers as opposed
> to dabblers and scripters.
>
> One of the larger web sites here in the city was built by a great Perl guy,
> but as th
dperl@perl.apache.org
> Subject: Re: highscalability.com report
>
> From: "Clinton Gormley"
> Subject: Re: highscalability.com report
>
>
> > On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 22:50 -0400, Jim Schueler wrote:
> >> Hope this doesn't get trapp
l talent has become a big
issue. I'm told that they're somewhere down the road to moving to PHP.
-Original Message-
From: Octavian Rasnita [mailto:orasn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 1:02 PM
To: Clinton Gormley; Jim Schueler
Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: R
From: "Clinton Gormley"
Subject: Re: highscalability.com report
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 22:50 -0400, Jim Schueler wrote:
Hope this doesn't get trapped by too many spam filters.
Sad news. Just saw a blog
http://www.highscalability.com/
that reports YouPorn.com switched f
On 04/12/2012 10:00 AM, Clinton Gormley wrote:
I think the bigger factor in the speed improvement is probably to do
with switching from MySQL to Redis
https://groups.google.com/group/redis-db/browse_thread/thread/77841c595d29f983?pli=1
They didn't really "switch" from mysql to redis. They are
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 22:50 -0400, Jim Schueler wrote:
> Hope this doesn't get trapped by too many spam filters.
>
> Sad news. Just saw a blog
>
>http://www.highscalability.com/
>
> that reports YouPorn.com switched from Perl to PHP. Apparently there's a
> reported 10% improvement in spee
Talking of youporn:
http://gizmodo.com/5899327/how-much-porn-does-the-internet-hold
10 Dual layer DVDs per second.
> Hi All,
> So they did a complete rewrite without changing the hardware?
> My guess is that the site on the same hardware would be substantially slower.
A change to the database design, as well as database engine (e.g.,
to something fantastic like PostgreSQL), indexing strategies, e
On 4/4/2012 1:41 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:37 AM, demerphq wrote:
>> On 4 April 2012 09:31, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>> When was the last time you built perl with no threading support? It's
>>> certainly a 5%-15% win.
>>
>> Not certainly. We did that and saw almost
On 4 Apr 2012, at 19:41, Fred Moyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:37 AM, demerphq wrote:
>> On 4 April 2012 09:31, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>> When was the last time you built perl with no threading support? It's
>>> certainly a 5%-15% win.
>>
>> Not certainly. We did that and saw
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:37 AM, demerphq wrote:
> On 4 April 2012 09:31, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>
>> When was the last time you built perl with no threading support? It's
>> certainly a 5%-15% win.
>
> Not certainly. We did that and saw almost no difference.
I've done two perlbench sets of
demerphq schrieb am 04.04.2012 um 15:37 (+0200):
> > When was the last time you built perl with no threading support?
> > It's certainly a 5%-15% win.
>
> Not certainly. We did that and saw almost no difference.
As I see threads mentioned here: I know that there's some Perl threads
knowledge o
Hi All,
So they did a complete rewrite without changing the hardware?
My guess is that the site on the same hardware would be substantially slower.
IMHO
Dave
On 04/04/12 08:23 AM, discobeta wrote:
agree, any rewrite of old code should improve by at least 10%, even if it was
written in
agree, any rewrite of old code should improve by at least 10%, even if it
was written in pascal
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:21 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Rolf Banting wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>>
>>
>> If they were to
>>
>>> rewrite it in Perl t
Rolf Banting wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
...
If they were to
rewrite it in Perl today, *it would go up again*!
- Perrin
No performance anxiety there then.
Particularly with a non-threaded Perl, which allows Apache to fork multiple
times..
On 4 April 2012 09:31, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 4/3/2012 9:50 PM, Jim Schueler wrote:
>> Hope this doesn't get trapped by too many spam filters.
>>
>> Sad news. Just saw a blog
>>
>> http://www.highscalability.com/
>>
>> that reports YouPorn.com switched from Perl to PHP. Apparently the
LOL
- Original Message -
From: Rolf Banting
To: Perrin Harkins
Cc: Jim Schueler ; modperl@perl.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: highscalability.com report
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
...
If they were
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> ...
If they were to
> rewrite it in Perl today, *it would go up again*!
>
> - Perrin
>
No performance anxiety there then.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Jim Schueler wrote:
> that reports YouPorn.com switched from Perl to PHP. Apparently there's a
> reported 10% improvement in speed, but I haven't noticed :).
We lost YouPorn?! Tragic!
I'd say the joke's on them though. If you rewrite an old site and
only get a
On 04/04/2012 10:31, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 4/3/2012 9:50 PM, Jim Schueler wrote:
>> Hope this doesn't get trapped by too many spam filters.
>>
>> Sad news. Just saw a blog
>>
>> http://www.highscalability.com/
>>
>> that reports YouPorn.com switched from Perl to PHP. Apparently there'
On 4/3/2012 9:50 PM, Jim Schueler wrote:
> Hope this doesn't get trapped by too many spam filters.
>
> Sad news. Just saw a blog
>
> http://www.highscalability.com/
>
> that reports YouPorn.com switched from Perl to PHP. Apparently there's a
> reported 10%
> improvement in speed, but I have
Hope this doesn't get trapped by too many spam filters.
Sad news. Just saw a blog
http://www.highscalability.com/
that reports YouPorn.com switched from Perl to PHP. Apparently there's a
reported 10% improvement in speed, but I haven't noticed :).
After a couple months of total immersion
25 matches
Mail list logo
