Stas Bekman wrote:
[...]
2)
D (+shrplib, -ithreads, +perlio, -debug) 128
A (+shrplib, -ithreads, +perlio, +debug) 100
D and A are the same builds, and similar to B&F the only difference is
debugging enabled in A. As you can see with ithreads disabled enabled
debugging affects the performance much
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 15:31, Stas Bekman wrote:
At the moment it looks like if you build your perl with -Uuseshrplib
-Uusethreads and don't enable debugging, and use a good selection of
optimization flags (like Mandrake 9.2's perl does), you will get the
best performance.
W
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 15:31, Stas Bekman wrote:
> At the moment it looks like if you build your perl with -Uuseshrplib
> -Uusethreads and don't enable debugging, and use a good selection of
> optimization flags (like Mandrake 9.2's perl does), you will get the
> best performance.
Whee! Benchmarki
John Day wrote:
[...]
Thanks for the comparisons. This is exactly what I think the bulk of users
need to see. Like me, there must be thousands of users who have no idea
what the compiler options mean and thus are not going to touch a single
one!
After your benchmark I can now relax and be comfortab
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 21:31, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks Perrin for this comparison numbers, but I think you didn't provide
enough build information. Default build opts vary from release to release and
from OS to OS, you really need to show the whole perl -V to make these num
Perrin Harkins wrote:
[...]
A) perl-5.006001
path= /usr/local/perl56/bin/perl
cc = cc
optimize= -O2
ccflags = -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
usemymalloc = n
B) perl-5.008
At 09:55 PM 11/10/2003 -0500, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 21:31, Stas Bekman wrote:
>> Thanks Perrin for this comparison numbers, but I think you didn't provide
>> enough build information. Default build opts vary from release to release and
>> from OS to OS, you really need to s
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 21:31, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Thanks Perrin for this comparison numbers, but I think you didn't provide
> enough build information. Default build opts vary from release to release and
> from OS to OS, you really need to show the whole perl -V to make these numbers
> more usef
Perrin Harkins wrote:
I grabbed perlbench from CPAN and did some more benchmarks. These
confirmed what we already suspected, i.e. there are no significant
performance differences in Perl itself between 5.6.1, 5.8.0, and 5.8.1,
but the stock Perl on Red Hat 9 (which is compiled with threads) is
sig
I grabbed perlbench from CPAN and did some more benchmarks. These
confirmed what we already suspected, i.e. there are no significant
performance differences in Perl itself between 5.6.1, 5.8.0, and 5.8.1,
but the stock Perl on Red Hat 9 (which is compiled with threads) is
significantly slower than
10 matches
Mail list logo
