Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-24 Thread Aaron Trevena
2008/7/17 Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP >> applications? > > http://perl.apache.org/products/app-server.html I would also suggest : http://www.perlfoundat

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-18 Thread Mark Hedges
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than > Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP > applications? thanks. You could help me debug Apache2::Controller. It is still unstable and incomplete, though. YAAF. --mark--

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP > applications? http://perl.apache.org/products/app-server.html - Perrin

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread Jeff Nokes
- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: modperl@perl.apache.org Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 8:52:58 AM Subject: framework for modperl applications I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? thanks. --penny

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread Michael Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Catalyst is big because of all the things it can do. If you want all of that stuff for free you need a big framework. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? I prefer CGI::Applic

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread Foo JH
Most will argue that it's not considered a framework per se, but I like HTML::Template. It's more of a templating engine really. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? thanks. --pe

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread W. Tyler Gee
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. >> Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP >> applications? >> thanks. My understanding is that Catalyst is as light as y

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread Fred Moyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? thanks. --penny Apache::Dispatch (http://search.cpan.org/dist/Apache-Dispatch) is on lightweight end of the spectrum, one step removed from

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread Rolf Schaufelberger
Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2008 17:52:58 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. > Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP > applications? > thanks. > > --penny I'm using HTML::Mason and MasonX::WebApp along with DBIx::Class as the main p

framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread pennyyh
I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? thanks. --penny