On Nov 8, 2007, at 1:40 PM, John ORourke wrote:
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight,
easy to
I can disagree -- nginx does everything that pound does, plus
will handle your vanilla
FLAME WAR!!!1!1!
well its not meant to flame... your options are this:
a)
From: "John ORourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Seriously though, it looks as though there are 5-10 good front end server
options which support the following to various degrees:
- reverse proxy
- caching
- load balancing
- static file serving
There is no clear choice since our setups range from singl
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
At the address
http://www.guindilla.eu/blog/2006/12/31/deployement-nginx-reverse-proxy-my-network/
I found the text below. Does anyone know if it is still true?
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight, easy to
I can disagree -- nginx does everythi
ge -
From: "Jonathan Vanasco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Clinton Gormley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "modperl list"
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: caching reverse proxy config+init scripts
On Nov 8, 2007, at 5:50 AM, Clinton Gor
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight, easy to
I can disagree -- nginx does everything that pound does, plus will
handle your vanilla static files and even use fcgi to handle php and
other stuff
Reading these responses I think a generic config is
On Nov 8, 2007, at 5:50 AM, Clinton Gormley wrote:
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight, easy to
configure, fast, stable, and makes the whole SSL and load balancing
dead
easy.
I can disagree -- nginx does everything that pound does, plus will
handle your vanilla s
> Although, I would go for something like pound doing the proxying for
> me, instead of mod_proxy
I can't agree more!
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight, easy to
configure, fast, stable, and makes the whole SSL and load balancing dead
easy.
Pound++
Clint
Randal is the master wizard, so you might wanna read that article in detail.
Although, I would go for something like pound doing the proxying for
me, instead of mod_proxy
I like to run apache on an unprivileged port, so that's an added
bonus, plus pound will take care of ssl too.
On 11/8/07, Ran
> "John" == John ORourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Hi folks,
John> I'm about to write a generic set of init scripts and config files to make
John> setting up dual apache servers (one light proxy/cache/ssl, one heavy
mod_perl)
John> easy.
John> Am I reinventing the wheel?
John> If no
Hi folks,
I'm about to write a generic set of init scripts and config files to
make setting up dual apache servers (one light proxy/cache/ssl, one
heavy mod_perl) easy.
Am I reinventing the wheel?
If not I'll post a link here when I'm done.
cheers
John
10 matches
Mail list logo
