[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
can anyone supply a simple example i then can check on our reverse
proxy ?
Try: t/response/TestApache/content_length_header.pm
Though I haven't tried to call it from the filter, so may be Jeff's
suggestion will work.
Jeff's suggestion does indeed work. oddly enou
Quoting Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
allan juul wrote:
[...]
Use must use $r->set_content_length(). See the mp2 test suite for
examples.
(i don't have that method available in my mod_perl2)
You sure do :)
% lookup set_content_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi i don't get it. the below filter does output the content alright it
seems, but the setting of the header *value* is incorrect. (?)
so the $f->print statement prints correct output
but the calcualtion length(output) is incorrect (since it evaluates
length of this exact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
allan juul wrote:
[...]
Use must use $r->set_content_length(). See the mp2 test suite for
examples.
(i don't have that method available in my mod_perl2)
You sure do :)
% lookup set_content_length
To use method 'set_content_length'
hi i don't get it. the below filter does output the content alright it
seems, but the setting of the header *value* is incorrect. (?)
so the $f->print statement prints correct output
but the calcualtion length(output) is incorrect (since it evaluates
length of this exact string "\n"
)
why is tha
Quoting Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
allan juul wrote:
[...]
Use must use $r->set_content_length(). See the mp2 test suite for examples.
(i don't have that method available in my mod_perl2)
You sure do :)
% lookup set_content_length
To use method 'set_content_length' add:
use Apache2::
allan juul wrote:
[...]
Use must use $r->set_content_length(). See the mp2 test suite for
examples.
(i don't have that method available in my mod_perl2)
You sure do :)
% lookup set_content_length
To use method 'set_content_length' add:
use Apache2::Response ();
http://perl.apache.org/docs
I've had some similar issues, but gotten around them by using
erro_headers_out. This worked for me, so you might give it a try:
$f->r->headers_out->unset('Content-Length');
$f->r->err_headers_out->set('Content-Length' => length($NewBody));
Obviously "$NewBody" is whatever you're
Stas Bekman wrote:
allan juul wrote:
hi stas
Stas Bekman wrote:
allan juul wrote:
[...]
But if you use a mod_perl filter you will still hit the issue of
unknown content-length header.
yes, of course that's true.
there goes caching (:
Not really. Nothing prevents you from buffering up the res
allan juul wrote:
hi stas
Stas Bekman wrote:
allan juul wrote:
[...]
But if you use a mod_perl filter you will still hit the issue of
unknown content-length header.
yes, of course that's true.
there goes caching (:
Not really. Nothing prevents you from buffering up the response,
process it, s
hi stas
Stas Bekman wrote:
allan juul wrote:
[...]
But if you use a mod_perl filter you will still hit the issue of
unknown content-length header.
yes, of course that's true.
there goes caching (:
Not really. Nothing prevents you from buffering up the response, process
it, set the content-leng
On 4/21/05, Dominique Quatravaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> allan juul wrote:
>
> |
> | so, is a mod_perl-enabled Apache acting as a proxy just a sick
> | idea. it will proxy content and the filter will have to scan all
> | response content
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
allan juul wrote:
|
| so, is a mod_perl-enabled Apache acting as a proxy just a sick
| idea. it will proxy content and the filter will have to scan all
| response content
A reverse-proxy in mod_perl is something I do for a living. When
scaling up it qui
allan juul wrote:
[...]
i have fiddled with mod_proxy_html to rewrite stuff and that works
ok, but have some features that doesn't mix well with our solution
(content -type is encoded utf-8, where we proxy to iso-8859-1 for
instance. or some html tags are stripped etc.) also caching becomes
slo
Stas Bekman wrote:
allan juul wrote:
hi
i need advice before i waste too much time on the bleeding obvious.
we have a setup where we will reverse proxy content both to our own
backend-servers (which run on IIS) and other external servers which
content we dont control. one of the reasons we proxy
Mod_rewrite?
--- allan juul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi
>
> i need advice before i waste too much time on the
> bleeding obvious.
>
> we have a setup where we will reverse proxy content
> both to our own
> backend-servers (which run on IIS) and other
> external servers which
> content we
allan juul wrote:
hi
i need advice before i waste too much time on the bleeding obvious.
we have a setup where we will reverse proxy content both to our own
backend-servers (which run on IIS) and other external servers which
content we dont control. one of the reasons we proxy is because of
spee
hi
i need advice before i waste too much time on the bleeding obvious.
we have a setup where we will reverse proxy content both to our own
backend-servers (which run on IIS) and other external servers which
content we dont control. one of the reasons we proxy is because of
speed/performance
we
18 matches
Mail list logo
