Re: Ugly build scenario...

2007-01-18 Thread Geoffrey Young
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Nevermind > > - no, it's not fun - and the project really should rethink failing >with an error or offering an override to bypass this error. > > In this case it was svn's bogus use checkout/export time and crossing > timezones > that have screwed up my datesta

Re: Ugly build scenario...

2007-01-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Nevermind - no, it's not fun - and the project really should rethink failing with an error or offering an override to bypass this error. In this case it was svn's bogus use checkout/export time and crossing timezones that have screwed up my datestamps. For a project with extreme dedication t

Ugly build scenario...

2007-01-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
On a very fast dual cpu xeon box, configuring and then running make under linux gives me; make[1]: Warning: File `Makefile.PL' has modification time 3.7e+03 s in the future Makefile out-of-date with respect to Makefile.PL Cleaning current config before rebuilding Makefile... make -f Makefile.old