--- Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James.Q.L wrote:
> > my apology.
> >
> > i was thinking that was a problem with mod_perl somewhere in my code since the
> > same snmp query
> > result is the same as the next one.
>
> It's possible, but you haven't even mentioned that you were runnin
James.Q.L wrote:
my apology.
i was thinking that was a problem with mod_perl somewhere in my code since the same
snmp query
result is the same as the next one.
It's possible, but you haven't even mentioned that you were running mod_perl
;). Have you tried running that code as a standalone progra
my apology.
i was thinking that was a problem with mod_perl somewhere in my code since the same
snmp query
result is the same as the next one.
Qiang
--- Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James.Q.L wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > i am using snmp and alarm together to timeout a snmp query(
James.Q.L wrote:
Hello,
i am using snmp and alarm together to timeout a snmp query( to printer ).
are you sure you wanted to send this to the modperl list?
Please find an appropriate list at: http://lists.perl.org/
thanks.
__
Stas
