Re: read query params

2006-02-13 Thread Perrin Harkins
M J wrote: I don't think that CGI.pm is a solution when you need performance. There is an article (http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/performance.html#Apache__args_vs__Apache__Request__param_vs__CGI__param) which describes this. You are worrying far too much about this. I use CGI.pm in ma

Re: read query params

2006-02-13 Thread M J
>Tom Schindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ehm, then you can use CGI.pm, that's plain perl. I don't think that CGI.pm is a solution when you need performance. There is an article (http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/performance.html#Apache__args_vs__Apache__Request__param_vs__CGI__p

Re: read query params

2006-02-10 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
On Feb 10, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Mark Galbreath wrote: I have one whineI bought "Practical mod_perl" from amazon.com and was v e r y disappointed that it only covered version 1 (only a brief reference to MP2). I understand that MP2 is so different that I've wasted $30 (well, at least Stas

Re: read query params

2006-02-10 Thread Frank Wiles
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:19:30 -0500 "Mark Galbreath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have one whineI bought "Practical mod_perl" from amazon.com and > was v e r y disappointed that it only covered version 1 (only a brief > reference to MP2). I understand that MP2 is so different that I've > was

Re: read query params

2006-02-10 Thread Mark Galbreath
I have one whineI bought "Practical mod_perl" from amazon.com and was v e r y disappointed that it only covered version 1 (only a brief reference to MP2).  I understand that MP2 is so different that I've wasted $30 (well, at least Stas and Eric will get about 10 cents out of it).   mark>>> Bo

Re: read query params

2006-02-10 Thread Boysenberry Payne
P.S. With the modification that you made for mod_perl2 you will loose a lot of perl programmer and I doubt that you will get new ones.   I think you might be mistaken here. I love MP2 even though I've had my fair share or issues to work out with it. The new Apache hooks are fabulous. I was abl

Re: read query params

2006-02-10 Thread Tom Schindl
Hi MJ, have you tried the libapreq mailing list? M J wrote: > > */>Tom Schindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote: ehm, then you can use > CGI.pm, that's plain perl. > > I don't think that CGI.pm is a solution when you need performance. > There is an article > (http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/pe

Re: read query params

2006-02-10 Thread Tom Schindl
ehm, then you can use CGI.pm, that's plain perl. Tom M J wrote: > > I’m very disappointed regarding the mod_perl 2 documentation and changes > that have been made. > I’m searching for several hours already how can I read the query params > using only mod_perl2 API. > I had problem installing lib

Re: read query params

2006-02-09 Thread Fred Moyer
M J wrote: I’m very disappointed regarding the mod_perl 2 documentation and changes that have been made. I’m searching for several hours already how can I read the query params using only mod_perl2 API. I had problem installing libapreq2-2.06-dev and I’m tired to debug that

Re: read query params

2006-02-09 Thread Foo Ji-Haw
That's hard to say. I've been using mp2 professionally, and so far installing libapreq2 has been pretty painless; both on Win32 and FreeBSD platforms. Win32 is pre-packaged, so it's quite predictable. FreeBSD's version is compiled from source, but still it's problem-free.   You really need t