Re: mp2: push_handlers / set_handlers vs. Perl*Handler

2006-09-13 Thread Geoffrey Young
> So I have been playing with different combinations of push_handlers() > and it looks like it's working properly for RUN_FIRST handlers (my > initial success with using DECLINED instead of OK) but not RUN_ALL > handlers. argh. > Here's the test case, run make test and check the log to see > wh

Re: mp2: push_handlers / set_handlers vs. Perl*Handler

2006-09-13 Thread Fred Moyer
Jeremy Nixon wrote: > Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> But... once I changed my return codes to allow the other handlers to >> return DECLINED instead of OK in a couple of particular situations, >> push_handlers() behaved as I would have expected it to. I'm guessing >> that your PerlFi

Re: mp2: push_handlers / set_handlers vs. Perl*Handler

2006-09-13 Thread Jeremy Nixon
Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But... once I changed my return codes to allow the other handlers to > return DECLINED instead of OK in a couple of particular situations, > push_handlers() behaved as I would have expected it to. I'm guessing > that your PerlFixupHandler is set to return

Re: mp2: push_handlers / set_handlers vs. Perl*Handler

2006-09-12 Thread Fred Moyer
Jeremy Nixon wrote: > I'm having some frustration with managing Perl handler registrations. > > It seems that, if I register a handler from within my code, either using > push_handlers or by grabbing the list with get_handlers, modifying it, > and then doing set_handlers -- any other handlers for