On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 12:01 -0500, Matthew Berk wrote:
> I have come up with a bit of a hackish, near term solution. Wanted to
> share it with the group.
>
> - check to see if a subroutine in the library is defined()
> - if not, delete() the library name from %INC
> - require() the library
I have come up with a bit of a hackish, near term solution. Wanted to
share it with the group.
- check to see if a subroutine in the library is defined()
- if not, delete() the library name from %INC
- require() the library
This corrects the behavior we were seeing quite well, without much
ov
Matthew Berk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Apologies in advance for the conceptual nature of this inquiry.
>
> I have two chunks of code that are being run as separate scripts under
> Registry. Both are using require() (I know, I know) to pull in a
> library of subroutines.
If you're abusing req
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:28 -0500, Matthew Berk wrote:
> Besides not keeping strict, which I'm doing intentionally to support a
> bit of older code, am I violating a fundamental rule of mod_perl around
> namespace contention?
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/troubleshooting.html#Undefined_s
