On 11/19/10 11:58 AM, Ryan Gies wrote:
One is to iterate over the filenames with subrequests (if this is even
possible/supported), so that each can be passed internally to a single request
Although you could get them to work, I don't think sub-requests are your answer.
They run through all of th
On 11/18/2010 06:15 PM, Brian wrote:
One is to iterate over the filenames with subrequests (if this is even
possible/supported), so that each can be passed internally to a single
request as in the simple (single-file) handler described in the
example above. If the output of the subrequests can
On 11/18/10 6:53 PM, André Warnier wrote:
I'd also like to avoid the last resort which would be to run a long process to
process each file, save them to a temporary directory, and then re-read them
>
Why is that "the last resort" ?
It seems to me to be the logical way of achieving what you want
Brian wrote:
...
I'd also like to avoid the last resort which would be to run a long
process to process each file, save them to a temporary directory, and
then re-read them
(one after the other)
at the end
(and send them out)
a single output stream. This defeats
the purpose because I'd lik
