Re: Web Content Compression FAQ - update

2005-04-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Slava Bizyayev wrote: On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 23:08, Scott Gifford wrote: ... I'm just explaining why the > probably showed up. Right, I hope I've fixed this in POD original for now by joining 'From' line with the previous one. Luckily for me, it was not the beginning of the paragraph... :) In commo

Re: Web Content Compression FAQ - update

2005-04-19 Thread Slava Bizyayev
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 23:08, Scott Gifford wrote: > ... I'm just explaining why the > probably showed up. Right, I hope I've fixed this in POD original for now by joining 'From' line with the previous one. Luckily for me, it was not the beginning of the paragraph... In common case for the future,

Re: Web Content Compression FAQ - update

2005-04-18 Thread Scott Gifford
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Scott Gifford wrote: >> Slava Bizyayev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >>>Strangely... There is no '>' in my original. Neither I find in >>>attachment that I sent... >> That's a standard mangling required by the Unix mbox format; new >> messages are si

Re: Web Content Compression FAQ - update

2005-04-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Scott Gifford wrote: Slava Bizyayev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thanks, Stas! On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 12:10, Stas Bekman wrote: [...] Also, please fix your original: - >From the perspective of global architecture and scalability planning, + From the perspective of global architecture and scalabili

Re: Web Content Compression FAQ - update

2005-04-18 Thread Scott Gifford
Slava Bizyayev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks, Stas! > On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 12:10, Stas Bekman wrote: [...] >> Also, please fix your original: >> >> - >From the perspective of global architecture and scalability planning, >> + From the perspective of global architecture and scalability p

Re: Web Content Compression FAQ - update

2005-04-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Slava Bizyayev wrote: Thanks, Stas! On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 12:10, Stas Bekman wrote: Thanks Slava, committed. I'd further suggest to drop all =head2 strings, merging the content with the question, making the TOC even more useful and the text more readable. Frankly speaking, I don't like this idea.

Re: Web Content Compression FAQ - update

2005-04-18 Thread Slava Bizyayev
Thanks, Stas! On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 12:10, Stas Bekman wrote: > Thanks Slava, committed. > > I'd further suggest to drop all =head2 strings, merging the content with > the question, making the TOC even more useful and the text more readable. Frankly speaking, I don't like this idea. From my poi

Re: Web Content Compression FAQ - update

2005-04-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Slava Bizyayev wrote: Updated POD version is attached regarding the Stas' suggestion of better formatting. Any other questions and/or suggestions are very welcome. Thanks Slava, committed. I'd further suggest to drop all =head2 strings, merging the content with the question, making the TOC even mo