Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 13:32 -0500, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
some of the general user presentation would probably develop well under
php -- but I dont want to consider that at the expense of the mod_perl
processes.
I think it's pretty much guaranteed that it will be m
On 15/02/2005, at 10:40 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 13:32 -0500, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
some of the general user presentation would probably develop well
under
php -- but I dont want to consider that at the expense of the mod_perl
processes.
I think it's pretty much guaranteed
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 13:32 -0500, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> some of the general user presentation would probably develop well under
> php -- but I dont want to consider that at the expense of the mod_perl
> processes.
I think it's pretty much guaranteed that it will be more work to make
perl an
[SNIP]
> I'm all about using the right-tool-for the right job, and I'm debating
> now whether it would be worth doing some of that user-presentation
> stuff under php.
Not to skirt the issue, but what type presentation tasks are you
finding difficult to do under mod_perl? Maybe we can help you re
