Fred Moyer and Michael Peters were correct about not wanting to
have 5.8.x libraries under perl 5.10.1. As soon as I built a
5.10.1 cleanly with no retained libraries, the undef's in
Dynaload in mod_perl2 make test went away.
The biggest remaining problem was getting apreq2-2.12 to build
correct
On Sep 2, 2009, at 6:21 AM, Michael Peters wrote:
cr...@animalhead.com wrote:
I have always included previous perl libraries in the @INC of
new builds. And it has always worked, with the single
exception of building mod_perl2 this time. All of the perl
scripts and modules on my site work we
Hi Fred,
Decided to look at the source found by your 'ack'.
It turns out that, in file pad.c, someone in the perl 5.10.0 or 5.10.1
project decided that the Perl_pad_sv routine was only needed if
-DDEBUGGING was specified for the Perl build.
Fixed this by commenting out the #ifdef DEBUGGING at l
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:14 PM, wrote:
> But this is the mod_perl mailing list. It is the place to which
> one sends reports of bugs or problems with mod_perl. I sent such
> a report, citing this undefined symbol when building mod_perl2.
Right, but if you are mixing major versions of perl, you
But this is the mod_perl mailing list. It is the place to which
one sends reports of bugs or problems with mod_perl. I sent such
a report, citing this undefined symbol when building mod_perl2.
It is hard for me to imagine that the fact that I gave the perl
build process a list of directories to
[cc'ing the list as to not break the thread]
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:41 PM, wrote:
> I have always included previous perl libraries in the @INC of
> new builds. And it has always worked, with the single
> exception of building mod_perl2 this time. All of the perl
> scripts and modules on my si
Can you please cc the list on all replies?
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:41 PM, wrote:
> cd /build/perl-5.10.1/
> make veryclean
> ./Configure -Dd_dosuid
> -Dotherlibdirs=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9:/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9:/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8:/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8:/us
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:27 AM, wrote:
> A bit more data on the problem reported below:
>
> /build/modperl-2.0 $ grep -r Perl_pad_sv *
> Binary file src/modules/perl/mod_perl.so matches
> /build/modperl-2.0 $ ll src/modules/perl/mod_perl.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 user wheel 1559168 Aug 29 21:22 src/mod
A bit more data on the problem reported below:
/build/modperl-2.0 $ grep -r Perl_pad_sv *
Binary file src/modules/perl/mod_perl.so matches
/build/modperl-2.0 $ ll src/modules/perl/mod_perl.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 user wheel 1559168 Aug 29 21:22 src/modules/perl/
mod_perl.so
/build/modperl-2.0 $ cd /
On Aug 30, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Fred Moyer wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 9:43 PM, wrote:
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
I have upgraded to Apache 2.2.13 and Perl 5.10.1. Both seem to be
working
OK,
although Apache with using my
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 9:43 PM, wrote:
> -8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
> 1. Problem Description:
>
> I have upgraded to Apache 2.2.13 and Perl 5.10.1. Both seem to be working
> OK,
> although Apache with using my old mod_perl 2.04 that uses perl 5.8.9.
Have
11 matches
Mail list logo
