RE: Testing issues w/ mod_perl 1.99_13

2004-03-29 Thread Kinyon, Rob
ib/perl5/site_perl . *** Packages of interest status: Apache::Request: - CGI: 3.03 LWP: 5.76 mod_perl : 1.9912 3. This is the core dump trace: (if you get a core dump): None. This report was generated by t/REPORT on Mon Mar 29 19:09:28 2004 GMT. -

Re: Testing issues w/ mod_perl 1.99_13

2004-03-28 Thread Stas Bekman
Obitz, Toby wrote: > Stas, > > You had asked me to reply to the list with an answer to your question: > > "BTW, can you please try 1.99_12. Do you have the same failures? Please > reply to that thread on the modperl list. And let's continue that > discussion over there." > > I have tried the follow

Re: Testing issues w/ mod_perl 1.99_13

2004-03-26 Thread Stas Bekman
[cc'ing Toby who is in the same boat] Kinyon, Rob wrote: t/filter/both_str_con_add.t43 75.00% 2-4 t/protocol/echo.t 22 5632 32 66.67% 2-3 t/protocol/echo_filter.t 22 5632 32 66.67% 2-3 Interesting, all 3 test have one thing in common -

Re: Testing issues w/ mod_perl 1.99_13

2004-03-26 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: Kinyon, Rob wrote: Rob, please submit a properl bug report: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ You can't be bothered to help us resolve your problems? :( __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hac

RE: Testing issues w/ mod_perl 1.99_13

2004-03-26 Thread Kinyon, Rob
> t/filter/both_str_con_add.t43 75.00% 2-4 > t/protocol/echo.t 22 5632 32 66.67% 2-3 > t/protocol/echo_filter.t 22 5632 32 66.67% 2-3 Interesting, all 3 test have one thing in common - they use a raw socket to communicate with the clien

Re: Testing issues w/ mod_perl 1.99_13

2004-03-25 Thread Stas Bekman
Kinyon, Rob wrote: Rob, please submit a properl bug report: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ 2) _13 compiled fine using 2.0.49. However, it will not pass the tests. I removed all mention of RewriteEngine, but still ran into problems. The error log has no errors in it. The only item is that it seems t

Re: Testing issues w/ mod_perl 1.99_13

2004-03-25 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: + +RewriteEngine On actually, rewrite seems to be a leftover, maybe from when the test was being originally written - I can't see the need for rewrite at all and removing the RewriteEngine directive still allows the tests to pass (as you mentioned). bu

Re: Testing issues w/ mod_perl 1.99_13

2004-03-25 Thread Geoffrey Young
> + > +RewriteEngine On actually, rewrite seems to be a leftover, maybe from when the test was being originally written - I can't see the need for rewrite at all and removing the RewriteEngine directive still allows the tests to pass (as you mentioned). but let's let stas l

Re: Testing issues w/ mod_perl 1.99_13

2004-03-25 Thread Geoffrey Young
Geoffrey Young wrote: >>I'm having problems in that some of the tests in _12 and _13 use >>RewriteEngine, which I have disabled. To get _12 to pass, I had to >>delete all mention of "RewriteEngine". > > > please try the attached patch. oops, sorry - I forgot to change one thing. please discar

Re: Testing issues w/ mod_perl 1.99_13

2004-03-25 Thread Geoffrey Young
> I'm having problems in that some of the tests in _12 and _13 use > RewriteEngine, which I have disabled. To get _12 to pass, I had to > delete all mention of "RewriteEngine". please try the attached patch. --Geoff Index: t/filter/both_str_req_proxy.t ===